Back

Pervasive fitness trade-offs revealed by rapid adaption in large experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster

Bitter, M. C.; Greenblum, S.; Rajpurohit, S.; Bergland, A. O.; Hemker, J. A.; Betancourt, N. J.; Tilk, S.; Berardi, S.; Oken, H.; Schmidt, P.; Petrov, D.

2024-10-29 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.10.28.620721 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Trade-offs are an inherent feature of organismal biology that are expected play a fundamental role in the evolution of natural populations. Efforts to quantify trade-offs are largely confined to phenotypic measurements and the identification of negative genetic-correlations among fitness-relevant traits. Here, we use time-series genomic data collected during experimental evolution in large, genetically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster to directly measure the manifestation of trade-offs in response to fluctuating selection on ecological timescales. Specifically, we first conducted a lab-based selection experiment to quantify a genome-wide signal of antagonistic pleiotropy elicited in response to shifting population densities and associated with reproduction and stress tolerance selection. In doing so, we identified a putative role of two cosmopolitan inversions in these trade-offs. We then conducted an independent experiment to show that a simple manipulation of increasing population density under controlled lab-based conditions identified loci that are relevant to selection during population expansion and collapse in a complex, semi-natural setting. In concert, our results reveal how adaptation in complex, natural environments can be coarse-grained in such a manner to drive repeatable and predictable patterns of genomic variation, and further add credence to models positing a role of generic fitness trade-offs in the maintenance of variation in natural populations.

Published in Ecology Letters (predicted rank #18) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.