Back

The aberrant language network dynamics in autism ages 5-40 years

Hu, Z.; Guo, X.; Yang, J.; Qu, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Gao, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Li, W.; Huang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Yuan, B.

2024-10-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.28.620600 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLanguage impairments across both structural components and pragmatic use are frequently observed in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). These difficulties are thought to stem from atypical brain development and abnormal network interactions, yet an integrative network-level model accounting for such impairments remains lacking. MethodsTo bridge this gap, we applied the dynamic meta-networking framework of language, a theoretical model capturing domain-segregation dynamics during rest, to examine age-related changes (5-60 years) in cortical language networks in individuals with ASD. To further probe the biological underpinnings of these dynamics, we quantified spatial correspondences between network state hubs and gene co-expression modules as well as neurotransmitter receptor distributions. ResultsWe identified distinct language meta-states characterized by domain-segregation connectivity patterns, which exhibited spatial alignment with gene co-expression modules and neurotransmitter systems. Individuals with ASD showed state-dependent developmental trajectories marked by age-related hypo- and hyper-connectivity. Critically, these network alterations strongly predicted verbal IQ and communicative difficulties, but were unrelated to social functioning or stereotyped behaviors. ConclusionsOur findings provide novel evidence that language-related network dynamics in ASD are developmentally altered, biologically grounded, and selectively linked to verbal and communicative impairments. These results advance a network-level model of language dysfunction in ASD and highlight potential mechanistic pathways for targeted interventions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.