Back

Early detection of non-small cell lung cancer using electronic health record data

Li, X.; Yuan, E.; Kuperberg, S. J.; Bonzel, C.-L.; Jeffway, M. I.; Cai, T.; Liao, K. P.; Aguiar-Ibanez, R.; Kao, Y.-H.; Santorelli, M. L.; Christiani, D. C.; Cai, T.; Duan, R.

2024-10-29 oncology
10.1101/2024.10.28.24316275 medRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleSpecific patient characteristics increase the risk of cancer, necessitating personalized healthcare approaches. For high-risk individuals, tailored clinical management ensures proactive monitoring and timely interventions. Electronic Health Records (EHR) data are crucial for supporting these personalized approaches, improving cancer prevention and early diagnosis. ObjectivesWe leverage EHR data and build a prediction model for early detection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsWe utilize data from Mass General Brighams EHR and implement a three-stage ensemble learning approach. Initially, we generate risk scores using multivariate logistic regression in a self-control and case-control design to distinguish between cases and controls. Subsequently, these risk scores are integrated and calibrated using a prospective Cox model to develop the risk prediction model. ResultsWe identified 127 EHR-derived features predictive for early detection of NSCLC. The highly predictive features include smoking, relevant lab test results, and chronic lung diseases. The predictive model reached area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.801 (positive predictive value (PPV) 0.0173 with specificity 0.02) for predicting one-year NSCLC risk in a population aged 18 and above, and AUC of 0.757 (PPV 0.0196 with specificity 0.02) in a population aged 40 and above. ConclusionsThis study identified EHR derived features which are predictive of early NSCLC diagnosis. The developed risk prediction model exhibits superior performance for early detection of NSCLC compared to a baseline model that only relies on demographic and smoking information, demonstrating the potential of incorporating EHR derived features for personalized cancer screening recommendations and early detection.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.