Back

Decoding Non-coding SNPs: Systems Genomics Modelling Dissects the Heterogeneity of IBD

Modos, D.; Thomas, J. P.; Brooks-Warburton, J.; Poletti, M.; Bohar, B.; Madgwick, M.; Csabai, L.; Kang, W.-X.; Alexander-Dann, B.; Zoufir, A.; Sudhakar, P.; Cozzetto, D.; Fazekas, D.; Carding, S. R.; Powell, N.; Verstockt, B.; Bender, A.; Korcsmaros, T.

2024-10-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.10.28.24316194 medRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies have pinpointed numerous susceptibility loci in complex diseases like chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs), yet their impact on pathomechanisms remain poorly understood. Genetic epistasis, low effect sizes, and predominance within non-coding genomic regions, remain major challenges to the functional interpretation of IMID-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). To address this, we present a novel systems genomics approach which models the cumulative impact of non-coding SNPs on downstream cellular signalling and gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Applying this to the prototypical chronic IMIDs of Crohns disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), both forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we individually analysed 2,636 patient genomes. Signals from non-coding SNPs were found to propagate towards well-established and novel CD- and UC-associated pathogenic pathways through the signalling and gene regulatory layers. The SNP-propagated GRNs stratified CD and UC patients into distinct clusters corresponding to cell type-specific gene dysregulation and therapeutic response. This approach bridges the gap between genotype and phenotype, laying the foundations for accelerating precision medicine in complex diseases.

Published in Molecular Systems Biology (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.