Back

Cohort profile: The Cancer Risk Associated with the Body Art of Tattooing (CRABAT) study

Hosseini, B.; McCarty, R. D.; Zins, M.; Goldberg, M.; Ribet, C.; Schreiver, I.; Ezzedine, K.; Schuez, J.; Foerster, M.

2024-11-01 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.10.28.24316120
Show abstract

Tattooing, involving the injection of pigments into the skin, has become increasingly popular, with up to 40% of individuals under 40 years old tattooed in high-income countries. Despite regulatory measures, tattoo inks may contain hazardous substances such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, primary aromatic amines, and metallic impurities, many of which are classified as carcinogens. Research on systemic health risks, particularly cancer, associated with intradermal ink exposure remains limited. Complications like contact allergies and inflammatory skin reactions are more frequently reported among tattooed individuals. However, cancer risks from tattooing, especially for internal cancers like lymphoma, are challenging to assess. Existing case-control studies indicate mixed findings regarding hematologic cancers, with one large study reporting a 20% increased lymphoma risk among tattooed individuals in the first two years post-tattooing. Here, we present the Cancer Risk Associated with the Body Art of Tattooing (CRABAT) study, that is, to our knowledge, the first larger study that prospectively investigates tattoo-related cancer risks. CRABAT follows up over 110,000 participants for long-term health effects within the French Constances cohort with objective cancer data linkage. Of [~]13,000 participants that were tattooed in 2020, detailed tattoo exposure assessment via a validated tattoo exposure questionnaire was conducted in 2023 (response rate >60%). With its robust dataset through linkage to the Constances variable pool, CRABAT enables the analysis of exposure-response relationships, and addresses potential confounders such as sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, and alternative pathways such as tattoo-related infections. Body word count: 2498 words

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 42%
12.3%
2
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 0.4%
4.6%
4
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 5%
4.6%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 44%
4.4%
6
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
7
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 12%
2.4%
8
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
9
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 37%
2.3%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 14%
1.5%
11
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
based on 32 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
12
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 14%
1.3%
50% of probability mass above
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 13%
1.3%
14
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
15
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Environment International
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
18
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 16%
1.3%
19
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
based on 10 papers
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
21
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 37%
1.2%
23
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 19%
0.8%
25
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
27
Preventive Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
29
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 7%
0.7%