Cohort profile: The Cancer Risk Associated with the Body Art of Tattooing (CRABAT) study
Hosseini, B.; McCarty, R. D.; Zins, M.; Goldberg, M.; Ribet, C.; Schreiver, I.; Ezzedine, K.; Schuez, J.; Foerster, M.
Show abstract
Tattooing, involving the injection of pigments into the skin, has become increasingly popular, with up to 40% of individuals under 40 years old tattooed in high-income countries. Despite regulatory measures, tattoo inks may contain hazardous substances such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, primary aromatic amines, and metallic impurities, many of which are classified as carcinogens. Research on systemic health risks, particularly cancer, associated with intradermal ink exposure remains limited. Complications like contact allergies and inflammatory skin reactions are more frequently reported among tattooed individuals. However, cancer risks from tattooing, especially for internal cancers like lymphoma, are challenging to assess. Existing case-control studies indicate mixed findings regarding hematologic cancers, with one large study reporting a 20% increased lymphoma risk among tattooed individuals in the first two years post-tattooing. Here, we present the Cancer Risk Associated with the Body Art of Tattooing (CRABAT) study, that is, to our knowledge, the first larger study that prospectively investigates tattoo-related cancer risks. CRABAT follows up over 110,000 participants for long-term health effects within the French Constances cohort with objective cancer data linkage. Of [~]13,000 participants that were tattooed in 2020, detailed tattoo exposure assessment via a validated tattoo exposure questionnaire was conducted in 2023 (response rate >60%). With its robust dataset through linkage to the Constances variable pool, CRABAT enables the analysis of exposure-response relationships, and addresses potential confounders such as sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, and alternative pathways such as tattoo-related infections. Body word count: 2498 words
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of a tattooed population and a possible role of tattoos as a risk factor for chronic diseases: Results from the LIFE-Adult-Study 96%
- Prevalence of Ocular Trauma and Barriers to Use of Personal Protective Devices Among Welders in Hetauda, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study 92%
- Deviation from mendelian transmission of autosomal SNPs can be used to estimate germline mutations in humans exposed to ionizing radiation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of plasma omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids with overall and 19 site-specific cancers: a population-based cohort study in UK Biobank 91%
- Reproductive Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer by Tumor Subtypes among Ghanaian Women: A Population-based Case-control Study 89%
- Free testosterone and malignant melanoma risk in men: prospective analyses of testosterone and SHBG with 19 cancers in men and postmenopausal women UK Biobank 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tattoo ink exposure is associated with lymphoma and skin cancers – a Danish study of twins 96%
- Improving on estimates of the relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking 91%
- How can we maximise the benefits of smoke-free prisons? Decision analytic model to predict potential impacts on public health 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.