Back

Dysfunction of the episodic memory network in the Alzheimer's disease cascade

Lattmann-Grefe, R.; Vockert, N.; Machts, J.; Suksangkharn, Y.; Yakupov, R.; Schuetze, H.; Glanz, W.; Incesoy, E.; Butryn, M.; Luesebrink, F.; Schmid, M.; Stark, M.; Kleineidam, L.; Spottke, A.; Coenjaerts, M.; Brosseron, F.; Fliessbach, K.; Schneider, A.; Dechent, P.; Hetzer, S.; Scheffler, K.; Ramirez, A.; Laske, C.; Sodenkamp, S.; Altenstein, S.; Schneider, L.-S.; Gref, D.; Spruth, E. J.; Lohse, A.; Schott, B. H.; Wiltfang, J.; Kilimann, I.; Goerss, D.; Rostamzadeh, A.; Priller, J.; Peters, O.; Hellmann-Regen, J.; Teipel, S.; Jessen, F.; Maass, A.; Ziegler, G.; Duezel, E.

2024-10-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.25.620237 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alzheimers disease (AD) is a major cause of dementia and cognitive decline. Here we assessed how episodic memory circuit dysfunction, a hallmark of AD, is related to the longitudinal cascade of AD biomarkers, neurodegeneration and cognition using data from the DZNE Longitudinal Cognitive Impairment and Dementia study. This data set is unique by including over 1000 longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements during episodic memory encoding. We leveraged a disease progression model (DPM) to obtain AD progression scores. Voxel-wise analyses revealed widespread loss of deactivation (hyperactivation) and activation (hypoactivation) with increasing disease stage. Hyperactivation trajectories were nonlinear and visually preceded trajectories of cognition. Overall, hyperactivation was independently associated with co-occurrence of amyloid- and tau-positivity and neurodegeneration, suggesting synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration as two independent drives of cognitive decline. Our results therefore provide evidence for a critical time window in which pharmacological treatments targeting the synapse may improve cognition.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.