Telemedicine in Eye Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Patient & Physician Perspectives
Halajyan, C. P.; Thomas, J.; Xu, B.; Gluckstein, J.; Jiang, X.
Show abstract
PurposeThere has been an increase in the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review used systematic search and review criteria to assess the literature on patient and physician perspectives toward telemedicine for vision care during the pandemic. MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms to identify peer-reviewed studies examining telemedicine use in eye care during the pandemic. The search strategy encompassed three key concepts: COVID-19 or pandemic, telehealth or telemedicine, and eye care. Further screening of references and similar articles was conducted to identify additional relevant studies. ResultsWe identified 24 relevant studies published between 2020 and 2022. Of these, 15 focused on patients perspectives, while 12 explored physicians perspectives. Predominantly cross-sectional in design, these studies were mainly conducted during the initial wave of the pandemic (March 2020 to June 2020), primarily in urban locations and hospital settings. Patients were satisfied with telemedicine and considered it equally effective to in-person visits. Patients believed telemedicine was convenient, improved eye care access, and a beneficial triage tool. Physicians acknowledged telemedicines convenience for follow-up assessment and its ability to expand the capacity for emergency cases. However, both patients and physicians voiced concerns about the absence of ancillary examination and technological challenges. ConclusionOur review highlights the positive impact of telemedicine in eye care during the pandemic. Nonetheless, most studies were limited in sample size. They did not delve into potential disparities based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, factors that could influence patient attitudes toward telemedicine. Further research is warranted to validate the findings from our selected studies and explore factors that influence the implementation of telemedicine, particularly across various eye care subspecialties.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Using electronic health record data to determine the safety of aqueous humor liquid biopsies for molecular analyses 94%
- Peripheral optical coherence tomography assisted by scleral depression in retinopathy of prematurity 93%
- Autonomous screening for Diabetic Macular Edema using deep learning processing of retinal images 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The learning curve of murine subretinal injection among clinically trained ophthalmic surgeons 95%
- Low-cost, Smartphone-based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium 93%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unveiling the Clinical Incapabilities: A Benchmarking Study of GPT-4V(ision) for Ophthalmic Multimodal Image Analysis 95%
- Risk Model for Intraoperative Complication during Cataract Surgery Based on Data from 900,000 Eyes – Previous Intravitreal Injection is a Risk Factor 94%
- Performance of DeepSeek-R1 in Ophthalmology: An Evaluation of Clinical Decision-Making and Cost-Effectiveness 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated vision screening of children using a mobile graphic device 94%
- Increasing frequency of hospital admissions for retinal detachment and vitreo-retinal surgery in England 2000-2018 93%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.