Back

Comparison of the extent and progression of respiratory and cardiovascular disease in World Trade Center responders to lung screening participants

Jirapatnakul, A.; Yip, R.; Branch, A. D.; Yankelevitz, D. F.; Henschke, C. I.

2024-10-27 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2024.10.25.24316091 medRxiv
Show abstract

Responders to the World Trade Center (WTC) site in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks were exposed to toxic dust, which has been linked to increased risk of respiratory and cardiovascular disease. The respiratory and cardiovascular effects of WTC dust exposure have been studied using pulmonary function tests and the number of cardiovascular events, but computed tomography (CT) scans provide an opportunity to see the early structural changes in the lungs and cardiovascular system before clinical symptoms appear. CT scans are used in the screening and evaluation of respiratory diseases such as lung cancer, interstitial lung disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and to visualize coronary arteries and quantify the amount of coronary artery calcifications; in fact, it is possible to detect multiple diseases from a single chest CT scan. While manual evaluation by a radiologist is often the gold standard, automated image analysis tools can quickly and accurately quantify these diseases. We identified non-contrast chest CT scans from members of the World Trade Center General Responders Cohort (WTC GRC) with slice thickness of 2.5 mm or less. We used the open-source Chest Imaging Platform software to compute measures of emphysema and interstitial lung disease and research software from Cornell University to compute measures of pulmonary hypertension and coronary artery calcification. We identified a sex, age (within 5 years), smoking status, one or more CT scans, and follow-up time -matched cohort of participants enrolled in the lung screening program at Mount Sinai. We compared disease measures from the WTC GRC group to the lung screening group to assess whether there was a difference in the extent and progression of disease. There were 4909 chest CT images of members of the WTC GRC that met our image quality criteria. There were 3855 members of the GRC for which we could obtain both chest CT images and clinical data. Of these, there were 2284 members for which we could obtain pulmonary disease measurements on at least one scan, 1246 members for which we could calculate cardiac measurements. The matched controls from the lung screening cohort consisted of 557 participants with 1122 chest CT images that met our image quality criteria and for which we obtained all four disease measures. We compared members of the WTC GRC with matched participants from the lung screening program. One of the key findings is that after a median time of 11-13 years after 9/11, the WTC GRC group exhibited higher burdens of coronary artery calcification, emphysema, and interstitial lung disease compared with a matched control group of lung screening participants. This supports the continued surveillance of WTC responders.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
4
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
5
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
6
Respiratory Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
10
BMC Research Notes
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
12
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
13
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
18
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
19
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
20
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%