Back

Dendritome Mapping Unveils Spatial Organization of Striatal D1/D2-Neuron Morphology

Park, C. S.; Yan, M.; Zhu, M.; Akram, M. A.; Foster, N. N.; Bennecke, A.; Choi, C.; Marrett, K.; Moradi, K.; Zhang, J. Y.; Magat, G.; Nanda, S.; Vaca, R.; Wijaya, K.; Zablan, J. R.; Lee, S.; Song, C.; Lara, M. J.; Louie, M.; Cong, J.; Kim, Y.; Ascoli, G. A.; Langfelder, P.; Tward, D.; Dong, H.-W.; Yang, X. W.

2024-10-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.24.619934 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Morphology is a cardinal feature of a neuron and mediates its functions, but profiling neuronal morphologies at scale remains a formidable challenge. Here we describe a generalizable pipeline for large-scale brainwide profiling of dendritic morphology of genetically-defined single neurons in the mouse brain. We generated a dataset of 3,762 3D-reconstructed and reference-atlas mapped striatal D1- and D2-medium spiny neurons (MSNs). Integrative morphometric analyses reveal distinct impacts of D1/D2 and anatomical locations on MSN morphology. To analyze striatal regional features of MSN dendrites without prior anatomical constraints, we assigned MSNs to a lattice of cubic boxes in the reference brain atlas, and summarized morphometric representation ("eigen-morph") for each box and clustered boxes with shared morphometry. This analysis reveals 6 modules with characteristic dendritic features and spanning contiguous striatal territories, each receiving distinct corticostriatal inputs. Finally, we found aging confers robust and concordant dendritic length and branching defects in D1/D2-MSNs, while Huntingtons disease (HD) mice exhibit MSN-subtype and striatal regional specific pathology. Together, our study demonstrates a systems-biology approach to profile dendritic morphology of genetically-defined single-neurons; and defines novel striatal D1/D2-MSN morphological territories and aging- or HD-associated pathologies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.