Trends in smoking prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities across regions in England: a population study, 2006 to 2024
Jackson, S. E.; Cox, S.; Buss, V.; Tattan-Birch, H.; Brown, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn addition to national policies and interventions, certain regions in England (particularly in the North) coordinate regional tobacco control programmes. This study examined trends in tobacco smoking prevalence and socioeconomic inequalities in smoking across regions. MethodsData were obtained from monthly household surveys of adults ([≥]16y) in England, conducted between November 2006 and July 2024 (total n=368,057). We used logistic regression to estimate time trends in current smoking by region, and tested interactions with occupational social grade to explore differences between more and less advantaged groups. ResultsSmoking prevalence declined most in the North (28.8% to 15.8%; -12.9 percentage points [95%CI -14.4; -11.5]), similar to the national average in the Midlands (25.2% to 16.0%; -9.2 [-10.6; -7.9]), and least in the South (22.7% to 17.3%; -5.3 [-6.5; -4.0]), reducing regional disparities such that prevalence was similar across regions in 2024. Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking prevalence between more and less advantaged social grades fell most in Yorkshire and the Humber (from 17.9 percentage points [14.1; 21.8] to 3.7 [0.4; 7.0]) and the West Midlands (from 16.1 [12.8; 19.6] to 3.0 [-0.03; 6.0]). Regions with sustained regional tobacco control activity saw greater declines in smoking prevalence (-18.1 [-21.4; - 14.7]) than regions with none (-12.8 [-13.9; -11.6]). ConclusionsBetween 2006 and 2024, smoking rates in the North of England fell faster than the national average, aligning with other regions. Regional tobacco control programmes appeared to contribute to this progress.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in vaping trends since the announcement of an impending ban on disposable vapes: a population study in Great Britain 96%
- Moderators of changes in smoking, drinking, and quitting behaviour associated with the first Covid-19 lockdown in England 96%
- Association of the Covid-19 lockdown with smoking, drinking, and attempts to quit in England: an analysis of 2019-2020 data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- CoMix: Changes in social contacts as measured by the contact survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in England between March 2020 and March 2021 90%
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 88%
- Impact on alcohol selection and purchasing of increasing the proportion of non-alcoholic versus alcoholic drinks: randomised controlled trial 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 90%
- Detecting COVID-19 infection hotspots in England using large-scale self-reported data from a mobile application: a prospective, observational study 88%
- Changes in COVID-19-related mortality across key demographic and clinical subgroups: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform on 18 million adults in England 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smoking in social housing among adults in England, 2015-2020: a nationally representative survey 94%
- Risk of death among teachers in England and Wales during the Covid19 pandemic 90%
- E-cigarette use and combustible tobacco cigarette smoking uptake among non-smokers, including relapse in former smokers: umbrella review, systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of banning smoking in cars with children on exposure to second-hand smoke: a natural experiment in England and Scotland 93%
- Current tobacco smoking and risk from COVID-19: results from a population symptom app in over 2.4 million people 91%
- Asthma hospitalisations and heat exposure in England: A case-crossover study during 2002-2019 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.