Mechanistic genotype-phenotype translation using hierarchical transformers
Lee, I.; Wallace, Z.; Park, S.; Nam, H.; Majithia, A.; Ideker, T.
Show abstract
Genome-wide association studies have linked millions of genetic variants to biomedical phenotypes, but their utility has been limited by lack of mechanistic understanding and widespread epistatic interactions. Recently, Transformer models have emerged as powerful machine learning architectures with potential to address these and other challenges. Here we introduce the Genotype-to-Phenotype Transformer (G2PT), a framework for modeling hierarchical information flow among variants, genes, multigenic systems, and phenotypes. As proof-of-concept, we train G2PT to model the genetics of metabolic traits including insulin resistance (serum triglycerides-to-HDL ratio), LDL and type-2 diabetes. G2PT predicts these traits with accuracy exceeding state-of-the-art and, unlike other polygenic models, extends to distinct populations not used for training. Predictions of insulin resistance are based on >1,395 variants within 20 systems and include epistatic interactions among variants, e.g. between APOA4 and CETP in phospholipid transfer. This work positions hierarchical graph transformers as a next-generation approach to polygenic risk.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- SNP-to-gene linking strategies reveal contributions of enhancer-related and candidate master-regulator genes to autoimmune disease 97%
- Characterizing the genetic architecture of drug response using gene-context interaction methods 97%
- Meta-analysis fine-mapping is often miscalibrated at single-variant resolution 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic effects of sequence-conserved enhancer-like elements on human complex traits 96%
- A fast non-parametric test of association for multiple traits 96%
- MoCHI: neural networks to fit interpretable models and quantify energies, energetic couplings, epistasis and allostery from deep mutational scanning data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.