Back

Equivalence between representational similarity analysis, centered kernel alignment, and canonical correlations analysis

Williams, A. H.

2024-10-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.23.619871 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Centered kernel alignment (CKA) and representational similarity analysis (RSA) of dissimilarity matrices are two popular methods for comparing neural systems in terms of representational geometry. Although they follow a conceptually similar approach, typical implementations of CKA and RSA tend to result in numerically different outcomes. Here, I show that these two approaches are largely equivalent once one incorporates a mean-centering step into RSA. This equivalence holds for both linear and nonlinear variants of these methods. These connections are simple to derive, but appear to have been thus far overlooked in the context of comparing neural representations. By unifying these measures, this paper hopes to simplify a complex and fragmented literature on this subject.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.6%
2
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.3%
4
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
6
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.4%
9
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
19
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Biostatistics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
Biometrics
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%