Back

Imaging of live bacterial whole-cell biosensors illuminates spatial sialic acid availability within the inflamed mammalian gut

Carreno, D.; Robinson, C. M.; Jackson, R.; Li, P.; Nunes, V.; Palma-Duran, S. A.; Nye, E.; MacRae, J. I.; Riglar, D. T.

2024-10-23 synthetic biology
10.1101/2024.10.23.619804 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Host mucin-derived sialic acids are key drivers of microbial colonisation, growth and pathogenicity within the mammalian gut. However, their study is hindered by complex spatiotemporal dynamics: Many gut metabolites, including sialic acids, are rapidly consumed, transformed or absorbed by the microbiota or host, meaning that conventional measurements of faeces or bulk digesta often fail to capture their true local availability. In contrast, engineered bacterial-whole cell biosensors provide an in situ read-out of metabolite exposure at the point and time of use, before these molecules are depleted. Here, we demonstrate increases in the bioavailability of sialic acid in the inflamed mouse gut using an engineered Escherichia coli biosensor that reports on sialic acid exposure via NanR-regulated transcriptional circuit. The biosensor robustly colonises the mouse gut and remains functional for at least six weeks. Through organ-scale imaging at single bacterial resolution we observe strong correlations between disease status and biosensor response in two inflammation models. Profiling along the length of the gut uncovers regional variations between the maximal sialic acid sensing and the peak inflammatory response within host tissues in a murine colitis model. Simultaneous tracking of host and microbial markers of inflammation informs the therapeutic response to sialidase inhibition, which accelerates disease recovery. Together, these data illuminate the complex spatial dynamics involved in shared host-microbiome metabolism and demonstrate the broader power of using engineered bacterial biosensors to monitor in situ bioavailability of rapidly turned-over metabolites within the gut.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.