The Incidence and Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the UK Population from the UKHSA Winter COVID Infection Study
Fyles, M.; Mellor, J.; Paton, R.; Overton, C. E.; Phillips, A. M.; Glaser, A.; Ward, T.
Show abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly during the winter period. The Winter Covid Infection Study (WCIS) ran from the 14th of November 2023 to the 7th of March 2024, and enabled the UK Health Security Agency to publish fortnightly estimates of the incidence and prevalence of SARS-CoV-2. Testing was performed using Lateral Flow Devices (LFD), and a repeat testing design was used to estimate key epidemiological parameters of SARS-CoV-2. This facilitated the estimation of time-varying prevalence, incidence, and test sensitivity. A Bayesian multilevel regression and poststratification model was developed to produce representative and unbiased estimates. In England and Scotland, prevalence peaked at 4.54% (95% CI: 3.90 to 5.24), and incidence peaked at 498 (95% CrI: 429 to 585) new infections per 100,000 individuals per day. The average LFD test sensitivity in England and Scotland during the study was estimated to be 72.1% (95% CrI: 70.3, 74.0), though due to epidemic phase bias this varied from a minimum value of 68.6% (95% CrI: 66.4 to 70.7) to a maximum value of 77.2% (95% CrI: 75.3 to 79.2). The novel study design of WCIS addressed key survey design challenges faced by previous large-scale SARS-CoV-2 population prevalence studies. The study demonstrated the utility and cost-benefit of LFD tests in large community surveys of prevalence.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of children in the spread of COVID-19: Using household data from Bnei Brak, Israel, to estimate the relative susceptibility and infectivity of children 96%
- Estimation of introduction and transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 in a prospective household study 96%
- Bayesian modelling of repeated cross-sectional epidemic prevalence survey data 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the trend of COVID-19 in Norway by combining multiple surveillance indicators 95%
- Threshold analyses on rates of testing, transmission, and contact for COVID-19 control in a university setting 95%
- Sorting out assortativity: when can we assess the contributions of different population groups to epidemic transmission? 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Appropriately smoothing prevalence data to inform estimates of growth rate and reproduction number 97%
- A simulation-based approach for estimating the time-dependent reproduction number from temporally aggregated disease incidence time series data 96%
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling testing and response strategies for COVID-19 outbreaks in remote Australian Aboriginal communities 95%
- Preventing a cluster from becoming a new wave in settings with zero community COVID-19 cases 94%
- Retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 omicron invasion over delta in French regions in 2021-22: a status-based multi-variant model 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.