Back

In silico nanoscope to study the interplay of genome organization and transcription regulation

Gopi, S.; Brandani, G. B.; Tan, C.; Jung, J.; Gu, C.; Mizutani, A.; Ochiai, H.; Sugita, Y.; Takada, S.

2024-10-25 molecular biology
10.1101/2024.10.22.619557 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In eukaryotic genomes, regulated access and communication between cis-regulatory elements (CREs) are necessary for enhancer-mediated transcription of genes. The molecular framework of the chromatin organization underlying such communication remains poorly understood. To better understand it, we develop a multiscale modeling pipeline to build near-atomistic models of the 200 kb Nanog gene locus in mouse embryonic stem cells comprising nucleosomes, transcription factors, co-activators, and RNA polymerase II-Mediator complexes. By integrating diverse experimental data, including protein localization, genomic interaction frequencies, cryo-electron microscopy, and single-molecule fluorescence studies, our model offers novel insights into chromatin organization and its role in enhancer-promoter communication. The models equilibrated by high-performance molecular dynamics simulations span a scale of [~]350 nm, revealing an experimentally consistent local and global organization of chromatin and transcriptional machinery. Our models elucidate that the sequence-regulated chromatin accessibility facilitates the recruitment of transcription regulatory proteins exclusively at CREs, guided by the contrasting nucleosome organization compared to other regions. By constructing an experimentally consistent near-atomic model of chromatin in the cellular environment, our approach provides a robust framework for future studies on nuclear compartmentalization, chromatin organization, and transcription regulation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.