An adaptive autoregressive diffusion approach to design active humanized antibody and nanobody
Ma, J.; Wu, F.; Xu, T.; Xu, S.; Liu, W.; Yan, D.; Bai, Q.; Yao, J.
Show abstract
Humanization is a critical process for designing efficiently specific antibodies and nanobodies prior to clinical trials. Developing widely recognized deep learning techniques or frameworks for humanizing conventional antibodies and nanobodies presents a valuable yet challenging task. Inspired by the effectiveness of diffusion models across various applications, we introduce HuDiff, an adaptive diffusion approach for humanizing antibodies and nanobodies from scratch, referred to as HuDiff-Ab and HuDiff-Nb, respectively. This approach begins the humanization process exclusively with complementarity-determining region (CDR) sequences, eliminating the need for humanized templates. On public benchmark datasets, the results of HuDiff-Abs humanized antibodies are more similar to experimentally humanized antibodies than to those of the Sapiens humanization model. Besides, humanized nanobodies produced by HuDiff-Nb exhibit a higher humanness score and greater nativeness than those generated by the Lammanade pipeline for humanization nanobody. We apply HuDiff to humanize a mouse antibody and an alpaca nanobody, both targeting the SARS-CoV-2 RBD, and validate the binding affinity of humanized sequences through Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI) experiments. The results show the binding affinity of the best humanized antibody is nearly equal to that of the parental mouse antibody (0.15 nM vs. 0.12 nM). Remarkably, the top-performing humanized nanobody exhibits a significantly enhanced binding affinity compared to the parental alpaca nanobody (2.52 nM vs. 5.47 nM), representing a 54% increase. These findings indicate that our approach HuDiff is highly effective in enhancing the humanness of antibodies and nanobodies while maintaining or potentially improving the binding affinity of the designed humanized sequences. The code and checkpoints of HuDiff are available at https://github.com/TencentAI4S/HuDiff.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AlphaBind, a Domain-Specific Model to Predict and Optimize Antibody-Antigen Binding Affinity 96%
- Deep learning assessment of nativeness and pairing likelihood for antibody and nanobody design with AbNatiV2 96%
- BioPhi: A platform for antibody design, humanization and humanness evaluation based on natural antibody repertoires and deep learning 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatically Defining Protein Words for Diverse Functional Predictions Based on Attention Analysis of a Protein Language Model 95%
- ProT-Diff: A Modularized and Efficient Approach to De Novo Generation of Antimicrobial Peptide Sequences through Integration of Protein Language Model and Diffusion Model 94%
- A Multi-Property Optimizing Generative Adversarial Network for de novo Antimicrobial Peptide Design 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- CaLMPhosKAN: Prediction of General Phosphorylation Sites in Proteins via Fusion of Codon Aware Embeddings with Amino Acid Aware Embeddings and Wavelet-based Kolmogorov Arnold Network 94%
- DrugTar Improves Druggability Prediction by Integrating Large Language Models and Gene Ontologies 94%
- Humanization of antibodies using a machine learning approach on large-scale repertoire data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.