Comprehensive structure-function analysis reveals gain- and loss-of-function mechanisms impacting oncogenic KRAS activity
Kwon, J.; Dilly, J.; Liu, S.; Kim, E.; Bian, Y.; Dharmaiah, S.; Tran, T. H.; Kapner, K. S.; Ly, S. H.; Yang, X.; Rabara, D.; Waybright, T. J.; Giacomelli, A. O.; Hong, A. L.; Misek, S. L.; Wang, B.; Ravi, A.; Beroukhim, R.; Lemke, C. T.; Haigis, K. M.; Esposito, D.; Root, D. E.; Nissley, D. V.; Stephen, A. G.; McCormick, F.; Simanshu, D. K.; Hahn, W. C.; Aguirre, A. J.
Show abstract
To dissect variant-function relationships in the KRAS oncoprotein, we performed deep mutational scanning (DMS) screens for both wild-type and KRASG12D mutant alleles. We defined the spectrum of oncogenic potential for nearly all possible KRAS variants, identifying several novel transforming alleles and elucidating a model to describe the frequency of KRAS mutations in human cancer as a function of transforming potential, mutational probability, and tissue-specific mutational signatures. Biochemical and structural analyses of variants identified in a KRASG12D second-site suppressor DMS screen revealed that attenuation of oncogenic KRAS can be mediated by protein instability and conformational rigidity, resulting in reduced binding affinity to effector proteins, such as RAF and PI3-kinases, or reduced SOS-mediated nucleotide exchange activity. These studies define the landscape of single amino acid alterations that modulate the function of KRAS, providing a resource for the clinical interpretation of KRAS variants and elucidating mechanisms of oncogenic KRAS inactivation for therapeutic exploitation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- FH variant pathogenicity promotes purine salvage pathway dependence in kidney cancer 97%
- Increased RNA and protein degradation is required for counteracting transcriptional burden and proteotoxic stress in human aneuploid cells 96%
- Electrical activity between skin cells regulates melanoma initiation 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.