Outcomes of children with serious traumatic brain injury treated in pediatric vs. adult departments
Bruns, N.; Hojeij, R.; Brensing, P.; Nonnemacher, M.; Dammann, P.; Dudda, M.; Felderhoff, U.; Stang, A.; Dohna-Schwake, C.
Show abstract
The impact of treatment in a non-pediatric department on mortality and outcomes of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown. This study aimed to quantify the impact of the treating department (pediatric (PD) or adult (AD)) on in-hospital case fatality and functional short-term outcomes in children with serious TBI who survived the initial 12 hours after hospital admission. A Nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted from a dataset that comprises all discharges from German hospitals from 2016 to 2021. Disease and procedural codes were used to retrieve clinical and outcome information. Hierarchical multilevel logistic regression modeling was performed to quantify the effect of the treating department on the outcomes of interest. Eligibility criteria were age < 18 years and hospital admission with serious TBI. The main outcome was in-hospital death and secondary outcomes were pediatric complex chronic conditions category (PCCC) [≥] 2 in survivors, composite outcome (death or PCCC [≥] 2), and adjusted mean PCCC in survivors. Of 13,492,528 pediatric cases, 12,275 were included. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for death was 3.00 (95 % confidence interval 1.93-4.68) for children treated in ADs compared to PDs. The OR for PCCC [≥] 2 was 0.93 (0.78-1.12) and 1.04 (0.87-1.25) for the composite outcome. Adjusted average PCCC were 0.40 (0.37-0.44) in ADs and 0.44 (0.42-0.46) in PDs. This comprehensive nationwide study found increased odds for in-hospital death but similar functional outcomes at discharge among surviving children with serious TBI who were treated outside of PDs.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risks for death after admission to pediatric intensive care (PICU) - a comparison with the general population 94%
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection on young adult population: international observational federated study based on electronic health records through the 4CE consortium 93%
- Serum fibrinogen level and fibrinogen administration in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality and outcomes after decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury 98%
- Natural Progression of Routine Laboratory Markers following Spinal Trauma: A Longitudinal, Multi-Cohort Study 94%
- Comparison of common outcome measures for assessing independence in patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ICD-10-based injury severity scores in pediatric trauma patients using the ICD-AIS map and survival rate ratios 98%
- Large-scale validation of the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) using a short form: high risk of bias models show poorer discrimination 85%
- Income inequality and access to advanced immunotherapy for lung cancer: the case of Durvalumab in the Netherlands 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 91%
- Risk factors for severity on admission and the disease progression during hospitalization in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients in Japan 91%
- Risk factors for severe outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Occult Intracranial Injuries On Computed Tomography (CT) Head Scans In Infants Investigated For Suspected Physical Abuse: A Retrospective Review 90%
- Diagnosing early-onset neonatal sepsis in low-resource settings: development of a multivariable prediction model 89%
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.