Back

Quality assessment and control of unprocessed anatomical, functional, and diffusion MRI of the human brain using MRIQC

Hagen, M. P.; Provins, C.; MacNicol, E.; Li, J.; Gomez, T.; Garcia, M.; Seeley, S.; Haitz Legarreta, J.; Norgaard, M.; Bissett, P.; Poldrack, R. A.; Rokem, A. G.; Esteban, O.

2024-10-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.21.619532 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quality control of MRI data prior to preprocessing is fundamental, as substandard data are known to increase variability spuriously. Currently, no automated or manual method reliably identifies subpar images, given pre-specified exclusion criteria. In this work, we propose a protocol describing how to carry out the visual assessment of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, functional, and diffusion MRI scans of the human brain with the visual reports generated by MRIQC. The protocol describes how to execute the software on all the images of the input dataset using typical research settings (i.e., a high-performance computing cluster). We then describe how to screen the visual reports generated with MRIQC to identify artifacts and potential quality issues and annotate the latter with the "rating widget" - a utility that enables rapid annotation and minimizes bookkeeping errors. Integrating proper quality control checks on the unprocessed data is fundamental to producing reliable statistical results and crucial to identifying faults in the scanning settings, preempting the acquisition of large datasets with persistent artifacts that should have been addressed as they emerged. RELATED LINKSO_ST_ABSKey reference(s) using this protocolC_ST_ABSEsteban, O. et al. (2017), PLoS ONE 12(9): e0184661. [10.1371/journal.pone.0184661] Esteban, O. et al. (2019), Sci Data 6, 30. [10.1038/s41597-019-0035-4] Esteban, O. et al. (2020), Nat Prot 15, 2186-2202. [10.1038/s41596-020-0327-3] Provins, C. et al. (2023), Front. Neuroinform. 1, 2813-1193. [10.3389/fnimg.2022.1073734] Bissett P. et al. (2024) Sci Data 11: 809. [10.1038/s41597-024-03636-y] Key data used in this protocolAmsterdam Open MRI Collection: Population Imaging of Psychology1 (AOMIC-PIOP1; ds002785 [https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds002785]).

Published in Nature Protocols (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.9%
3
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.9%
Nature Protocols · published here
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.2%
6
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
7
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
11
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
14
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
19
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
20
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
23
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%