Back

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Boosts Post-Error Accuracy During Perceptual Decision-Making

Su, S.; Vanvoorden, T.; Le Denmat, P.; Zenon, A.; Braconnier, C.; Duque, J.

2024-10-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.21.619457 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system is a well-established regulator of behavior, yet its precise role remains unclear. Animal studies predominantly support a "gain" hypothesis, suggesting that the LC-NE system enhances sensory processing, while human studies have proposed an alternative "urgency" hypothesis, postulating that LC-NE primarily accelerates responses. To address this discrepancy, we administered transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) in two experiments involving 43 participants. In the first experiment, we showed that 4-second tVNS trains reliably induced greater pupil dilation compared to SHAM condition, indicating increased LC-NE activity. In the second experiment, we applied tVNS during a random dot motion task to assess its impact on perceptual decision-making. Notably, tVNS improved accuracy without affecting reaction times, which appears inconsistent with the "urgency" hypothesis. Drift-diffusion model analyses further supported the "gain" hypothesis, revealing that tVNS increased the drift rate, indicative of enhanced evidence accumulation. Accuracy and drift-rate improvements were especially pronounced following errors and in less proficient participants, who otherwise exhibited post-error declines in these measures under SHAM condition. Our findings suggest that the influence of the LC-NE system adapts to task demands, becoming especially beneficial in challenging contexts. Overall, this study underscores the potential of tVNS as a non-invasive tool to investigate the causal role of the LC-NE system in human behavior.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.