Back

Crystallographic and NMR studies of Streptococcus pneumonia LCP protein PsrSp indicate the importance of dynamics in four long loops for ligand specificity

Sandalova, T.; Sala, B. M.; Moche, M.; Ljunggren, H.-G.; Alici, E.; Henriques-Normark, B.; Agback, T.; Lesovoy, D.; Agback, P.; Achour, A.

2024-10-21 microbiology
10.1101/2024.10.21.619401 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The crystal structure of the extracellular region of the second pneumococcal LCP, a polyisoprenyl-teichoic acid-peptidoglycan teichoic acid transferase PsrSp, was determined and refined to 2.15[A] resolution. Despite the low sequence homology with other LCP proteins, the PsrSp maintains the fold of the LCP domain and the positions of the 15 residues suggested to participate in the transferase function are conserved. The empty tunnel found in the PsrSp between the central {beta}-sheet and three -helices is wide enough to accommodate polyisoprenyl-teichoic acid. Comparison of the crystallographic temperature factors of LCP from distinct bacteria demonstrated that the four long loops located close to the teichoic acid and peptidoglycan binding sites have different relative mobility. To compare the dynamics of the PsrSp in crystalline state and in solution, NMR spectra were recorded, and 88% of the residues were assigned in the 1H-15N TROSY HSQC spectra. Comparison of the secondary structure of the crystal structure of PsrSp with NMR data demonstrated a perfect concordance between the results using these two methods. Moreover, the relative mobility of the essential loops estimated from the crystallographic B-factor is in good agreement with order parameter S2, predicted from chemical shift. We hypothesize that the dynamics of these loops are important for the substrate promiscuity of LCP proteins.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.