Back

Deleterious Variants Contribute Minimal Excess Risk in Large-Scale Testing

Huang, Y.-T.; Lai, E.-Y.; Su, J.-Y.; Lu, H.-J.; Chen, Y.-L.; Wu, J.-Y.; Wei, C.-y.; Li, L.-H.; Fann, C. S.- J.; Yang, H.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Chen, H.-H.; Liu, Y.-M.; Tsai, M.-F.; Yeh, E.-C.; Cheng, C.-K.; Wang, Y.-P.; Chi, N.-F.; Lee, I.-C.; Chen, H.-S.; Hsieh, Y.-C.; Liao, Y.-C.; Hsu, S.-J.; Ou, S.-M.; Lai, K.-L.; Lin, C.-C.; Chen, Y.-J.; Chang, C.-M.; Wang, P.-H.; Luo, Y.-H.; Chang, Y.-T.; Chen, C.-C.; Hsieh, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-M.; Hsiao, T.-H.; Lin, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-J.; Chen, I.-C.; Mao, C.-L.; Chang, S.-J.; Chang, Y.-L.; Liao, Y.-J.; Lai, C.-H.; Lee, W.-J.; Tung, H.; Yen, T.-T.; Yen, H.-C.; Chang

2024-10-22 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.10.21.24315653 medRxiv
Show abstract

DNA sequencing of patients with rare disorders has been highly successful in identifying "causal variants" for numerous conditions. However, there are many reports of healthy individuals who harbor these deleterious variants, leading to the concept of incomplete penetrance and doubt about the utility of genetic testing in clinical practice and population screening. As the deleterious variants are rare, the penetrance of these variants in the population is largely unknown. We analyzed the genetic and clinical data from 486,956 participants of the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative (TPMI) to determine the risk difference between those with and without deleterious variants. In all, we analyzed 292 disease-relevant variants and their clinical outcomes to assess their association. We found that only 15 variants show a risk difference exceeding 5% between those with or without the variants. In essence, 87.3% of deleterious variants exhibit minimal risk differences, suggesting a limited impact on the individual and population levels. Our analysis revealed increasing trends with age in six cardiovascular and degenerative diseases and bell-shaped trends in two cancers. Additionally, we identified three clinical outcomes exhibiting a dose-response relationship with the number of deleterious variants. Our findings show that large-scale testing of deleterious variants found in the literature is not warranted, except for those exhibiting large disease risk differences.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.8%
2
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
16.8%
3
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.8%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
5
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
8
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
9
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
11
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
13
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
19
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.9%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
28
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%