Back

A 128-channel receive array with enhanced SNR performance for 10.5 tesla brain imaging

Lagore, R. L.; Sadeghi-Tarakameh, A.; Grant, A.; Waks, M.; Auerbach, E.; Jungst, S.; DelaBarre, L.; Moeller, S.; Eryaman, Y.; Lattanzi, R.; Giannakopoulos, I.; Vizioli, L.; Yacoub, E.; Schmidt, S.; Metzger, G. J.; Wu, X.; Adriany, G.; Ugurbil, K.

2024-10-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.20.619294 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo develop and characterize the performance of a 128-channel head array for brain imaging at 10.5 tesla and evaluate the potential of brain imaging at this unique, >10 tesla magnetic field. MethodsThe coil is composed of a 16-channel self-decoupled loop transmit/receive array with a 112-loop receive-only (Rx) insert. Interactions between the outer transmitter and the inner 112Rx insert were mitigated using coaxial cable traps placed every 1/16 of a wavelength on each feed cable, locating most preamplifier boards outside the transmitter field and miniaturizing those placed directly on individual coils. ResultsThe 128-channel array described herein achieved 77% of ultimate intrinsic SNR in the center of the brain. Transmit field maps obtained experimentally on a phantom with and without the receive array were similar and matched EM simulations, leading to FDA approval for human imaging. Anatomical and functional data, including with power demanding sequences, were acquired successfully on human volunteers. ConclusionsCounterintuitive to expectations based on magnetic fields [≤]7T, the higher channel counts provided SNR gains centrally, capturing [~]80% uiSNR. Fraction of uiSNR achieved centrally in 64Rx, 80Rx, and 128Rx arrays suggested that a plateau was being reached at 80%. At this plateau, linear to approximately quadratic B0 dependent SNR gains for the periphery and the center, respectively, were observed for 10.5T relative 7T.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.