Back

Inter-laboratory harmonization of microsphere immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in dried blood spots and oral fluids

DeRosa, K. L.; Pisanic, N.; Kruczynski, K.; Heaney, C. D.; Styer, L. M.; MANTIS, N. J.

2024-10-22 immunology
10.1101/2024.10.19.619238 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dried blood spots (DBS) and oral fluids (OF) are easily attainable biospecimen types that have enabled population scale antibody monitoring for SARS-CoV-2 exposure and vaccination. However, the degree to which the two different biospecimen types can be used interchangeably remains unclear. To begin to address this question, we generated contrived DBS (cDBS) and OF (cOF) from serum panels from SARS-CoV-2 infected, vaccinated, and uninfected individuals. The contrived samples were evaluated using SARS-CoV-2 multiplexed microsphere immunoassays (MIAs) at two different institutions. Intra-laboratory tests revealed near perfect agreement between cDBS and cOF for N and S antigens, as evidenced by {kappa} = 0.97-1 and 98%-100% agreement. Inter-laboratory comparisons were equally robust for both N ({kappa} = 0.94-0.96; 97.5%-98 % agreement) and S ({kappa} = 0.98 -1.0; 99.0%-100%). Furthermore, assays were transferred between labs, including methods and reagents, and a subset of cDBS and cOF samples (n = 52) were tested. Qualitative concordance remained high ({kappa} = 0.94-1.0; 97.5%-100% agreement), confirming that integrity of the assays is retained upon transfer. In summary, our results provide evidence that DBS and OF can be used interchangeably across laboratories and institutions for the qualitative assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antibody determinations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.8%
2
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.7%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.4%
5
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
9
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
24
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
27
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
28
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%