Back

Identification of novel type 1 and type 2 diabetes genes by co-localization of human islet eQTL and GWAS variants with colocRedRibbon

Piron, A.; Szymczak, F.; Folon, L.; Crouch, D. J. M.; Papadopoulou, T.; Alvelos, M. I.; Colli, M. L.; Yi, X.; Pekalski, M.; Type 2 Diabetes Global Genomics Initiative, ; Defrance, M.; Todd, J. A.; Eizirik, D. L.; Mercader, J. M.; Cnop, M.

2024-10-21 endocrinology
10.1101/2024.10.19.24315808 medRxiv
Show abstract

Over 1,000 distinct genetic variants have been associated with diabetes risk by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) but for most their functional impact is unknown and less than 15% of the diabetes GWAS variants have been shown in expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) studies to alter gene expression in pancreatic islets. To fill this gap, we developed a new co-localization pipeline, called colocRedRibbon, that prefilters eQTL variants by direction of effect on gene expression, shortlists overlapping eQTL and GWAS variants and then runs the co-localization. Applying colocRedRibbon to diabetes and glycemic trait GWAS, we identified 292 co-localizing gene regions - 236 of which are new - including 24 co-localizations for type 1 diabetes and 268 for type 2 diabetes and glycemic traits. We achieved a four-fold increase in co-localizations, with the novel pipeline and updated GWAS each contributing two-fold. Among the co-localizations are a low frequency variant increasing MYO5C expression that reduces type 2 diabetes risk and a type 1 diabetes protective variant that increases FUT2 and decreases RASIP1 expression. These novel co-localizations represent a significant step forward to understand polygenic diabetes genetics and its impact on human islet gene expression.

Published in Cell Genomics (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.