Back

Self-pruning in tree crowns is influenced by functional strategies and neighborhood interactions

Kothari, S.; Urgoiti, J.; Messier, C.; Keeton, W. S.; Paquette, A.

2024-10-21 ecology
10.1101/2024.10.17.618957 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As canopy closure causes forest stands to face increasing light limitation, trees lower branches begin to die back. This process, called self-pruning, defines a crowns base and depth and shapes the structure of entire stands. Self-pruning is often thought to occur after shading causes individual branches to transition from net carbon sources to sinks. Under this explanation, we would expect resource-conservative and shade-tolerant species to initiate self-pruning under deeper shade because their branches need less light to maintain a positive carbon balance. However, the notion that branches are fully autonomous may be complicated by correlative inhibition, in which plants preferentially allocate resources towards sunlit branches. Consistent with this idea, we predicted that within species, trees with sunlit tops would initiate self-pruning at a higher light threshold. Lastly, we predicted that plot-level diversity in self-pruning strategies would correlate with productivity and total crown volume. We tested these predictions in an experiment where 12 temperate tree species were planted in plots of varying diversity and composition. We measured characteristics of crown size and position as well as the light level at the crown base (denoted Lbase), which we took as an estimate of the light threshold of self-pruning. As we predicted, more shade-tolerant and resource-conservative species self-pruned at a deeper level of shade (lower Lbase). In addition, most species had higher Lbase when they had more light at the crown top, suggestive of correlative inhibition. With respect to their neighbors traits, though, conservative and acquisitive species showed contrary patterns of plasticity: conservative species had lower Lbase around conservative neighbors, while acquisitive species had lower Lbase around acquisitive neighbors. However, all species declined in crown depth when they grew alongside larger, more acquisitive neighbors. As predicted, plots with a greater interspecific diversity of Lbase had greater basal area and crown volume. Using simulations, we showed that plasticity in crown depth between monocultures and mixtures strengthened the relationship with crown volume, primarily due to competitive release experienced by acquisitive species. By placing shade-induced self-pruning in a comparative context, we clarify how forest function emerges from competition for light between individual trees.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.7%
2
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.1%
4
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.1%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
9
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
12
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
13
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
16
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
18
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
19
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
23
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
25
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
27
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%