Back

Ketogenesis protects against MASLD-MASH progression through fat oxidation-independent mechanisms

Queathem, E. D.; Stagg, D.; Nelson, A.; Chaves, A. B.; Crown, S. B.; Fulghum, K.; d`Avignon, D. A.; Ryder, J. R.; Bolan, P. J.; Hayir, A.; Gillingham, J. R.; Jannatpour, S.; Rome, F. I.; Williams, A. S.; Muoio, D. M.; Ikramuddin, S.; Hughey, C. C.; Puchalska, P.; Crawford, P. A.

2024-10-17 biochemistry
10.1101/2024.10.17.618895 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractThe progression of metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) to metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) involves complex alterations in both liver-autonomous and systemic metabolism that influence the livers balance of fat accretion and disposal. Here, we quantify the relative contribution of hepatic oxidative pathways to liver injury in MASLD-MASH. Using NMR spectroscopy, UHPLC-MS, and GC-MS, we performed stable-isotope tracing and formal flux modeling to quantify hepatic oxidative fluxes in humans across the spectrum of MASLD-MASH, and in mouse models of impaired ketogenesis. We found in humans with MASH, that liver injury correlated positively with ketogenesis and total fat oxidation, but not with turnover of the tricarboxylic acid cycle. The use of loss-of-function mouse models demonstrated that disruption of mitochondrial HMG-CoA synthase (HMGCS2), the rate-limiting step of ketogenesis, impairs overall hepatic fat oxidation and induces a MASLD-MASH-like phenotype. Disruption of mitochondrial {beta}-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (BDH1), the terminal step of ketogenesis, also impaired fat oxidation, but surprisingly did not exacerbate steatotic liver injury. Taken together, these findings suggest that quantifiable variations in overall hepatic fat oxidation may not be a primary determinant of MASLD-to-MASH progression, but rather, that maintenance of hepatic ketogenesis could serve a protective role through additional mechanisms that extend beyond quantified overall rates of fat oxidation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.7%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.7%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
6
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
10
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
11
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
13
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
14
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
16
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
21
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%