The impact of health-system pharmacists on hospitalizations in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Van der Linden, L. R.; Beavers, C.; Forsyth, P.; Vandenbriele, C.; Tsuyuki, R. T.; Karapinar-Carkit, F.; Van Aelst, L. N.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrevious evidence has established the role of pharmacists in heart failure (HF) care. However, the specific role of health-system pharmacists within in- and outpatient settings for HF patients has been left unexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of health-system pharmacy interventions on all-cause and HF hospitalizations. MethodsA systematic literature search was performed using PUBMED and EMBASE, following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to May 2024 that evaluated the effects of health-system pharmacy interventions on hospitalizations in HF patients were included. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed using Cochranes risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models, with odds ratios (OR) as summary measure. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and Cochranes Q test. ResultsIn total, 11 RCTs involving 3576 patients were included in our review. The meta-analysis of 9 RCTs assessing all-cause hospitalizations (3472 patients, 927 events) demonstrated a significant reduction with pharmacist care (OR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.92, p=0.0119). The second meta-analysis of also 9 RCTs, focusing on HF hospitalizations (3442 patients, 504 events), showed similar results (OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.87, p=0.0038). Heterogeneity was moderate for both meta-analyses. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Subgroup analyses indicated greater effectiveness in outpatient settings and for extended interventions. ConclusionsHealth-system pharmacist interventions significantly reduce both all-cause and HF-specific hospitalizations in HF patients. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating pharmacists into multidisciplinary teams to improve HF management for in- and outpatients (PROSPERO: CRD42024593583).
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 95%
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 93%
- The protective association between statins use and adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 96%
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 92%
- Cardiac Post-acute Sequelae symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 in Community-Dwelling Adults: Cross-sectional Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 93%
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
- A potential impact of physical distancing on physical and mental health. A rapid narrative umbrella review of meta-analyses on the link between social isolation and health 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.