Back

What role do adolescents independent food purchasing choices play in their dietary quality?

Shaw, S.; Crozier, S.; Cooper, C.; Smith, D.; Barker, M.; Vogel, C.

2024-10-18 public and global health
10.1101/2024.10.17.24315666 medRxiv
Show abstract

During adolescence, many young people start to make more independent food purchases. Subsequently, these independent food choices will increasingly contribute to their overall diet quality; little is known, however, about this relationship. This study aimed to examine the role adolescents independent food purchases play in their diet quality and assess if these relationships vary according to socio-economic status. A convenience sample of adolescents aged 11-18 years and attending secondary school or college in Hampshire, England, were recruited to participate in a one-week cross-sectional observational study. A validated 20-item Food Frequency Questionnaire assessed diet quality. Participants used an ecological momentary assessment mobile phone app to record food purchases. Over seven days, 552 food/drink items were purchased on 253 food purchasing occasions by 80 participants. The majority of purchases (n=329, 60%) were coded as not adhering to the UK Eatwell Guide, 32% were coded as adhering and 9% fell between these two categories. Healthier food purchasing was associated with better diet quality ({beta} 0.48, (95%CI 0.01, 0.96) p=0.05); results attenuated after adjustment for confounders ({beta} 0.36, (95%CI -0.15, 0.87) p=0.16). Interaction models showed purchasing healthfulness was more strongly associated with diet quality among young people of lower SES (p=0.01). The majority of adolescents independent food purchases did not adhere to healthy eating guidelines. For adolescents experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, these food choices had a more detrimental impact on their overall diet quality than they did for more advantaged adolescents. Future research should focus on identifying ways to support more healthful independent food choices by adolescents to reduce dietary inequalities and improve health and well-being among the next generation of adults.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.