Are we in a Big Data era for multiple sclerosis? Lessons from integrating clinical trials and observational studies data into the PRIMUS precision medicine platform
Demuth, S.; Faddeenkov, I.; Paris, J.; Rousseau, O.; Baciotti, B.; Payet, M.; Casey, R.; Vukusic, S.; Doyle, S.; Jarre, G.; Vince, N.; Limou, S.; De Seze, J.; Kerbrat, A.; Laplaud, D.; Edan, G.; Gourraud, P.-A.; PRIMUS consortium,
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe "Projections In Multiple Sclerosis" (PRIMUS) project aims to develop a precision medicine platform enabling neurologists to support therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis by visualizing similar patient data among a reference database. We present a data integration method to combine randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies data and optimize their informativeness. MethodsWe developed an extract-transform-load data integration pipeline to combine 13 source databases with 31,786 patients: the "mother" and "high-definition" cohorts from the French MS registry and eleven industrial RCTs. We aimed to inform each treatment class initiation with at least 500 patients with 2-year clinical and MRI follow-up. Our data integration strategy used every patient visit as a potential baseline time point to inform a specific neurologist query to the platform, thus tailoring the actual analysis cohort to each patient. ResultsThe resulting PRIMUS database had 12,953 patients with at least one informative visit. It could inform 7/8 common treatment initiation scenarios with at least 500 patients (range: 485 for glatiramer acetate; 1,754 for natalizumab). The per-visit integration identified 696 more patients in the high-definition cohort than the classical epidemiological per-patient integration (+114 %). Although the mother cohorts longitudinal data were deemed to be sparse, we identified 6,128 informative patients (yield: 27.8%; mean: 2.2 visits per patient). InterpretationA data integration pipeline and per-visit integration enabled us to build a highly informative reference database to be queried by neurologists through a web application to support discussions with their patients and the selection of disease-modifying treatments.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Conformal prediction enables disease course prediction and allows individualized diagnostic uncertainty in multiple sclerosis 95%
- Crowdsourcing digital health measures to predict Parkinson's disease severity: the Parkinson's Disease Digital Biomarker DREAM Challenge 91%
- Clinical Knowledge Extraction via Sparse Embedding Regression (KESER) with Multi-Center Large Scale Electronic Health Record Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Interpretable Multimodal Machine Learning (IMML) framework reveals pathological signatures of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy 91%
- Pretrained Patient Trajectories for Adverse Drug Event Prediction Using Common Data Model-based Electronic Health Records 90%
- A user-friendly tool for cloud-based whole slide image segmentation, with examples from renal histopathology 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning approach to dynamic risk modeling of mortality in COVID-19: a UK Biobank study 92%
- Identifying cellular markers of focal cortical dysplasia type II with cell-type deconvolution and single-cell signatures 92%
- Interpretable machine learning identifies paediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus subtypes based on gene expression data 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.