Back

Validation of a Pan-Cancer NGS Liquid Biopsy Test for Routine Hospital Use: An International Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation

Lescuyer, G.; Harle, A.; KUMAR, H.; Constantoulakis, P.; Pfarr, N.; Heitzer, E.; Michon, C.; Russo, G.; Speel, E.-J.; Piecyk, M.; Husson, M.; Christopoulou, G.; Mayr, E.-M.; koppermann, M.-L.; Passot, C.; Graf, R.; Hadjadj Aoul, A.; Bourdon, V.; Dubbink, H.; van Marion, R.; Demers, I.; Dingemans, A.-M.; Troncone, G.; Pepe, F.; Muinelo-Romay, L.; Diaz-Lagares, a.; Rodriguez-Casanova, A.; Lago-Leston, R.; Pathak, D.; Shah, P.; Parillaud, R.; Martinez de Ilarduya, O.; Behr, J.; Rapin, A.; Vetterli, T.; Boppudi, S. M.; Malapelle, U.; PAYEN, L. F.

2024-10-19 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.10.17.24313324 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLiquid biopsy (LBx) assays are transforming precision oncology by the screening of genomic alterations in cfDNA. These assays provide a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsies, which are not always feasible. Molecular pathology laboratories require LBx assays that detect variants at low allele frequencies using standardized methods. MethodsThis study evaluated the Hedera Profiling 2 ctDNA test panel (HP2) (Hedera Dx, Epalinges, Switzerland), a hybrid capture-based NGS assay for the detection of somatic alterations from cfDNA. Covering 32 genes, HP2 enables the detection of SNVs, Indels, Fusions, CNVs, and MSI status from a single DNA-only workflow. The analytical performance was assessed using reference standards and a diverse cohort of 137 clinical samples pre-characterized by orthogonal methods. ResultsIn reference standards at 0.5% VAF, detection sensitivity and specificity for SNVs/Indels were 96.92% and 99.67%, respectively, and 100% each for Fusions. For MSI with VAFs of [≥]1% and CNVs with VAFs of [≥] 2% both achieved 100% sensitivity. ConclusionThis international, multicenter analytical performance evaluation study across a large number of hospital laboratories demonstrated high concordance of HP2 assay with orthogonal methods, confirming its significant potential as a highly sensitive, and efficient Pan-Cancer test for future decentralized LBx testing.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.8%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.9%
5
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
20
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%