Back

Guided assembly of multispecies positive biofilms targeting undesirable bacteria

Gueneau, V.; Guillier, L.; Berdous, C.; Noirot-Gros, M.-F.; Jimenez, G.; Plateau, J.; Serror, P.; Castex, M.; Briandet, R.

2024-10-17 microbiology
10.1101/2024.10.16.618781 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The use of synthetic microbial communities (SynComs) engineered to form positive biofilms that prevent the settlement of harmful bacteria is emerging as a promising strategy in biotechnology, particularly in reducing reliance on chemical antimicrobials. Despite this potential, the rationale for selecting specific strains in SynComs and the mechanisms underlying their antagonistic effects remains insufficiently understood. In this study, we present a bottom-up approach integrating live-cell imaging with high-throughput analysis of multi-strain biofilms across diverse scenarios. Through this method, we identified beneficial strains based on their superior ability to exclude undesirable bacteria and form mixed biofilms. Notably, our findings revealed that competitive strains against undesirable bacteria could also exclude other beneficial strains, emphasising the need for compatibility control in SynComs design. SynComs composed of B. velezensis and Pediococcus spp. demonstrated enhanced pathogen exclusion compared to single strains. Temporal analysis of biofilm interactions, supported by mathematical models, showed that pathogen exclusion was primarily driven by nutritional competition (Jameson effect) with additional specific interference mechanisms (prey-predator Lotka-Volterra model). Furthermore, pre-establishing SynComs to surfaces significantly increased pathogen inhibition, indicating a distinct biofilm-associated exclusion effect. These insights offer a framework for rational SynCom design and deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning positive biofilm applications. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=153 SRC="FIGDIR/small/618781v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (47K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a8ca36org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@173dc16org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1764af2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1328cfc_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.