Back

The Circadian Isoform Landscape of Mouse Livers

Zee, A.; Deng, D. Z. Q.; DiTacchio, L.; Vollmers, C.

2024-10-18 genomics
10.1101/2024.10.16.618716 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mammalian circadian clock is an autoregulatory feedback process that is responsible for homeostasis in mouse livers. These circadian processes are well understood at the gene-level, however, not well understood at the isoform-level. To investigate circadian oscillations at the isoform-level, we used the nanopore-based R2C2 method to create over 78 million highly-accurate, full-length cDNA reads for 12 RNA samples extracted from mouse livers collected at 2 hour intervals. To generate a circadian mouse liver isoform-level transcriptome, we processed these reads using the Mandalorion tool which identified and quantified 58,612 isoforms, 1806 of which showed circadian oscillations. We performed detailed analysis on the circadian oscillation of these isoforms, their coding sequences, and transcription start sites and compiled easy-to-access resources for other researchers. This study and its results add a new layer of detail to the quantitative analysis of transcriptomes.

Published in NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.5%
Similar papers in this journal
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · published here
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
5
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.7%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Physiological Genomics
● 16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
8
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.8%
10
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
11
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.5%
12
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
13
Cell Genomics
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
14
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.2%
15
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
17
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
◐ 351 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
◐ 252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
21
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.2%
22
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.2%
23
RNA Biology
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
24
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
25
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Genomics
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Open Biology
● 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
GENETICS
◐ 483 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Journal of Biological Chemistry
○ 690 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.