Back

Macrophage crosstalk with neural progenitors and fibroblasts controls regenerative neurogenesis via Sema4ab after spinal cord injury in zebrafish

Docampo Seara, A.; Cosacak, M. I.; Heilemann, K.; Kessel, F.; Oprisoreanu, A. M.; Cark, O.; Zoeller, D.; Arnold, J.; Bretschneider, A.; Hnatiuk, A.; Ninov, N.; Becker, C. G.; Becker, T.

2024-10-18 neuroscience Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.10.16.618445 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Zebrafish, in contrast to mammals, regenerate neurons after spinal cord injury, but little is known about the control mechanisms of this process. Here we use scRNA-seq and in vivo experiments to show that sema4ab, mainly expressed by lesion-reactive microglia, attenuates regenerative neurogenesis by changing the complex lesion environment. After spinal injury, disruption of sema4ab doubles the number of newly generated progenitor cells and neurons but attenuates axon regrowth and recovery of swimming function. Disruption of the plxnb1a/b receptors, selectively expressed by neural progenitor cells, increases regenerative neurogenesis. In addition, disruption of sema4ab alters activation state and cytokine expression of microglia, such that fibroblasts increase expression of the cytokine tgfb3, which strongly promotes regenerative neurogenesis. Hence, sema4ab in microglia attenuates regenerative neurogenesis in multiple ways, likely directly through plxnb1a/b receptors and indirectly, by controlling the inflammatory milieu and tgfb3 levels. Targeting Sema4A-dependent signalling in non-regenerating vertebrates may be a future strategy to improve regenerative outcomes. HIGHLIGHTS- Microglia suppress pro-regenerative fibroblast signalling in a spinal injury site - Fibroblasts promote regenerative neurogenesis via Tgfb3 signalling - sema4ab promotes microglia activation state after spinal injury - scRNA-seq reveals full complement of sema4ab-dependent changes on different cell types during repair of a spinal lesion site

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.