Back

Transfer to different host grapevines causes rapid and widespread transcriptional plasticity in the specialist insect Daktulosphaira vitifoliae

Collison, W. N.; Zafar, S. A.; Niels Groen, S. C.; Nabity, P. D.

2024-10-18 systems biology
10.1101/2024.10.15.618594 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Insect herbivores employ many adaptive mechanisms to successfully colonize host plants. Transcriptional plasticity is one mechanism that enables broad host use in polyphagous insect herbivores; however, whether specialist herbivores use transcriptional plasticity or undergo epigenome modifications to cope with host shifts remains largely unexplored. We measured the transcriptome and epigenome of the specialist aphid herbivore, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae, after transfer to new hosts using RNA-seq and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. We found the transcriptome of D. vitifoliae is highly plastic and responsive to host genotype - 3,706 genes (28% of expressed genes) are significantly differentially expressed in at least one contrast comparing host genotypes. Most host-responsive genes (2,667 genes) were upregulated when feeding on the non-native host Vitis vinifera and enriched for genes encoding predicted secretory effectors, detoxification enzymes, and cuticle- and chitin-associated proteins. We found gene co-expression modules that correlated with variation in fitness suggesting plasticity in transcriptional networks contributes to D. vitifoliae adaptation to host plants. We also identified a previously undescribed family of proline-rich secretory proteins conserved across the Aphidomorpha infraorder of insects. Unlike the transcriptome, DNA methylation did not dramatically respond to host transfer and positively correlated with stably expressed genes; thus, gene body DNA methylation may help stabilize gene expression when insects move to new host environments. Together, these results provide new insight into the molecular mechanisms of host use in insect herbivores.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.