Back

A bounded accumulation model of temporal generalization outperforms existing models and captures modality differences and learning effects

Ofir, N.; Landau, A. N.

2024-10-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.15.616846 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple systems in the brain track the passage of time and can adapt their activity to temporal requirements (Paton & Buonomano, 2018). While the neural implementation of timing varies widely between neural substrates and behavioral tasks, at the algorithmic level many of these behaviors can be described as bounded accumulation (Balc & Simen, 2024). So far, from the range of temporal psychophysical tasks, the bounded accumulation model has only been applied to temporal bisection, in which participants are requested to categorize an interval as "long" or "short" (Balc & Simen, 2014; Ofir & Landau, 2022). In this work, we extend the model to fit performance in the temporal generalization task, in which participants are required to categorize an interval as being the same or different compared to a standard, or reference, duration (Wearden, 1992). Previous models of performance in this task focused on either the group level or performance of highly trained animals (Birngruber et al., 2014; Church & Gibbon, 1982; Wearden, 1992). Whether the same models can fit performance from a few hundreds of trials of single participants, necessary for comparing performance across experimental manipulations, has not been tested. A drift-diffusion model with two decision boundaries fits the data of single participants better than the previous models. We ran two experiments, one comparing performance between vision and audition and another examining the effect of learning. We found that decision boundaries can be modified independently: While the upper boundary was higher in vision compared to audition, the lower boundary decreased with learning in the task.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.2%
3
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.2%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.2%
8
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
9
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
12
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
18
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
24
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
26
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
29
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%