Efficacy of the glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist Exenatide in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement - a randomized double-blind clinical trial
Kjaergaard, J.; Möller, C. H.; Wiberg, S.; Mikkelsen, A. D.; Moller-Sorensen, P. H.; Ravn, H. B.; Ravn, J.; Olsen, P. S.; Hofsten, D. E.; Boesgaard, S.; Kober, L.; Nilsson, J. C.; Hassager, C.
Show abstract
ImportanceGlucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have been proven beneficial in reducing risk of and injury associated with several cardiovascular diseases. The efficacy in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted cardiac surgery is unknown. ObjectiveThis trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of an infusion of the GLP-1 antagonist Exenatide during and after open heart surgery in reducing risk of death and major organ failure. DesignRandomized, double-blinded, 2-by-2 factorial design, clinical trial, also including liberal (FiO2 of 100%) or restrictive (FiO2 of 50%) oxygenation during and after bypass. The present paper presents the results of the Exenatide intervention. SettingSingle site, tertiary heart center. ParticipantsAdult patients undergoing elective cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting and/or aortic valve replacement. InterventionInfusion of 17.4 {micro}g og Exenatide or placebo during cardiopulmonary bypass and the first hour after weaning thereof Main outcomesThe main outcome was time to a composite endpoint consisting of death, stroke, renal failure requiring dialysis, or new/worsening heart failure during follow-up. Secondary endpoints included occurrence of prespecified adverse events. ResultsA total of 1389 patients were included in the analyses. Within a follow-up period of median of 5.9 years (min - max; 2.5 - 8.3 years), 170 patients (24%) in the Exenatide group and 165 patients (24%) experienced a primary endpoint. We found no difference in time to first event between patients randomized to FiO2 50% versus FiO2 100% (HR 1.0 [95%CI 0.83 - 1.3], p = 0.80). We found no significant difference in rates of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions and RelevanceExenatide during cardiopulmonary bypass and weaning thereof did not significantly reduce the incidence of death, stroke, renal failure, or new/worsening heart failure in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or aortic valve replacement. Trial registrationO_LIDanish Medicines Agency: Protocol no. HJE-PHARMA-001, EudraCT no. 2015-003050-41, 2nd of October 2015 C_LIO_LILocal Ethics Committee "Videnskabsetisk komite C, Region Hovedstaden": No. H-15010562 C_LI www.clinicaltrials.gov: ID no. NCT0267393 Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs a single dose of Exenatide effectively reducing risk of death or major organ injury in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted cardiac surgery? Findings1400 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or aortic valve replacement were randomized to 17,4 {micro}g of Exenatide or placebo during CPB and the first hour after weaning. The hazard ratio (95%CI) for time to the first occurring composite endpoint consisting of death, stroke, renal failure requiring dialysis, and new/worsening heart failure was 1.0 (0.83 - 1.3). MeaningExenatide infusion during CPB-assisted cardiac surgery does not improve outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Reduces Atrial Arrhythmias Post-Cardiac Surgery and Attenuates Atrial Stress Responses to Cardioplegic Arrest 94%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 93%
- Effectiveness of an Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 94%
- Lipid-Modulating Agents for Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19 in Randomized Trials 94%
- Antithrombotic Therapy in COVID-19: Systematic Summary of Ongoing or Completed Randomized Trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-sensitivity cardiac troponin on presentation to rule out myocardial infarction: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
- Effects of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: A Randomized Clinical Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of troponin and natriuretic peptides in takotsubo syndrome and acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of congenital heart disease procedures among children: Prospective cohort analyses of 26,270 procedures in 17,860 children using CVD-COVID-UK consortium record linkage data 93%
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diastolic Perfusion Pressure Predicts Response to Inotropes/Vasopressors and Benefit from Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock? 95%
- A Network Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 93%
- Impact of Advanced Therapy Centers on Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.