Back

Epigenetic and cognitive signatures of striatal DAT binding among healthy elderly individuals

Yaghoobi, A.; Seyedmirzaei, H.; Jamaat, M.; Ala, M.

2024-10-16 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.10.15.24315507 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundStriatal dopamine transporter (DAT) binding is a sensitive and specific endophenotype for detecting dopaminergic deficits across Parkinsons disease (PD) spectrum. Molecular and clinical signatures of PD in asymptomatic phases help understand the earliest pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the disease. We aimed to investigate whether blood epigenetic markers are associated with inter-individual variation of striatal DAT binding among healthy elderly individuals. We also investigated whether this potential inter-individual variation can manifest as dysfunction of particular cognitive domains. MethodWe conducted a blood epigenome-wide association study of striatal DAT binding on 96 healthy individuals using the Illumina EPIC array. For functional annotation of our top results, we employed the enhancer-gene mapping strategy using a midbrain single-nucleus multimodal dataset. Finally, we conducted several investigative regression analyses on several neuropsychological tests across five cognitive domains to assess their association with striatal DAT binding among 250 healthy subjects. ResultsWe identified seven suggestive (P-value<10-5) CpG probes. Specifically, three probes were colocalized with three risk loci previously identified in PDs largest Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS). UCN5A and APOE loci were identified as suggestive DMRs associated with striatal DAT binding. Functional analyses prioritized the FDFT1 gene as the potential target gene in the previously reported CTSB GWAS locus. We also showed that delayed recall memory impairment was correlated with reduced striatal DAT binding, irrespective of age. ConclusionOur study suggested epigenetic and cognitive signatures of striatal DAT binding among healthy individuals, providing valuable insights for future experimental and clinical studies of early PD.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.