A qualitative study exploring the diagnostic and treatment journeys of children and young people with gastroduodenal disorders of gut-brain interaction, their families, and the clinicians who care for them
Humphrey, G.; Law, M.; Keane, C.; Andrews, C. N.; Gharibans, A.; O'Grady, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundGastroduodenal disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are prevalent in the paediatric population. Diagnostic pathways and subsequent treatment management approaches for children and young people can be highly variable, leading to diverse patient and clinical experiences. This study explores the DGBI diagnostic experiences of children and their families and the perspectives of clinicians in the New Zealand context. MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 children with gastroduodenal DGBIs and their families and clinicians who care for children with DGBIs. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and narratively analysed. ResultsFive children and family themes emerged: 1) how it all started, 2) the impacts symptoms had on child and family life, 3) their experiences with testing and investigations, 4) the perceptions and impacts of challenging clinical relationships, and 5) the uncertainness of trial and error treatments. Clinicians also identified five key themes: 1) navigating the complexity of presenting symptomology, 2) the challenging diagnostic investigation decision-making process, 3) navigating management and treatment approaches, 4) a lack of standardised clinical pathways, and 5) establishing therapeutic relationships with patients and families. ConclusionChildren, their families, and clinicians confirmed the clinical complexity of DGBIs, the challenges of diagnosis and management, and the stress this places on therapeutic relationships. Clearer diagnostic pathways and new investigations that could provide improved identification and discrimination of DGBIs are needed to minimise the treat-test repeat cycle of care and improve health outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 95%
- Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 94%
- What constitutes 'poor' adherence to medical advice for chronic diseases? Insights from a qualitative study among hypertension and diabetes patients in urban informal settlements, Mumbai Metropolitan Region 93%
- Hidden stories of caregivers with children living with sickle cell disease in Uganda: experiences, coping strategies and outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How young people experienced Long COVID services: a qualitative analysis 95%
- Is it time to ACT? A qualitative study of the acceptability and feasibility of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for adolescents with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 93%
- A multi-centre service evaluation of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on presentation of newly diagnosed cancers and type 1 diabetes in children in the UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a taxonomy of care coordination for people living with rare conditions: A qualitative study 94%
- Development of models of care coordination for rare conditions: A qualitative study 94%
- Good communication is critical to supporting people living and working with a rare disease: current rare disease support perceived as inadequate. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 94%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 94%
- Understanding Covid-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.