Back

Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Speech Markers: Insights from English, Chinese, and Italian Speakers

Santi, G. C.; Catricala, E.; Kwan, S.; Wong, A.; Ezzes, Z.; Wauters, L.; Esposito, V.; Conca, F.; Gibbons, D.; Fernandez, E.; Santos-Santos, M. A.; Chen, T.-F.; Kwan-Chen, L. L.-Y.; Lo, R. R.; Tsoh, J.; Lung-Tat Chen, A.; Garcia, A. M.; de Leon, J.; Miller, Z.; Vonk, J. M. J.; Bruffaerts, R.; Grasso, S. M.; Allen, I. E.; Cappa, S. F.; Gorno-Tempini, M.-L.; Tee, B. L.

2024-10-16 neurology
10.1101/2024.10.15.24314191 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cross-linguistic studies with healthy individuals are vital, as they can reveal typologically common and different patterns while providing tailored benchmarks for patient studies. Nevertheless, cross-linguistic differences in narrative speech production, particularly among speakers of languages belonging to distinct language families, have been inadequately investigated. Using a picture description task, we analyze cross-linguistic variations in connected speech production across three linguistically diverse groups of cognitively normal participants--English, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese), and Italian speakers. We extracted 28 linguistic features, encompassing phonological, lexico-semantic, morpho-syntactic, and discourse/pragmatic domains. We utilized a semi-automated approach with Computerized Language ANalysis (CLAN) to compare the frequency of production of various linguistic features across the three language groups. Our findings revealed distinct proportional differences in linguistic feature usage among English, Chinese, and Italian speakers. Specifically, we found a reduced production of prepositions, conjunctions, and pronouns, and increased adverb use in the Chinese-speakers compared to the other two languages. Furthermore, English participants produced a higher proportion of prepositions, while Italian speakers produced significantly more conjunctions and empty pauses than the other groups. These findings demonstrate that the frequency of specific linguistic phenomena varies across languages, even when using the same harmonized task. This underscores the critical need to develop linguistically tailored language assessment tools and to identify speech markers that are appropriate for aphasia patients across different languages.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
6
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
26
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%