Back

Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Speech Markers: Insights from English, Chinese, and Italian Speakers

Santi, G. C.; Catricala, E.; Kwan, S.; Wong, A.; Ezzes, Z.; Wauters, L.; Esposito, V.; Conca, F.; Gibbons, D.; Fernandez, E.; Santos-Santos, M. A.; Chen, T.-F.; Kwan-Chen, L. L.-Y.; Lo, R. R.; Tsoh, J.; Lung-Tat Chen, A.; Garcia, A. M.; de Leon, J.; Miller, Z.; Vonk, J. M. J.; Bruffaerts, R.; Grasso, S. M.; Allen, I. E.; Cappa, S. F.; Gorno-Tempini, M.-L.; Tee, B. L.

2024-10-16 neurology
10.1101/2024.10.15.24314191
Show abstract

Cross-linguistic studies with healthy individuals are vital, as they can reveal typologically common and different patterns while providing tailored benchmarks for patient studies. Nevertheless, cross-linguistic differences in narrative speech production, particularly among speakers of languages belonging to distinct language families, have been inadequately investigated. Using a picture description task, we analyze cross-linguistic variations in connected speech production across three linguistically diverse groups of cognitively normal participants--English, Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese), and Italian speakers. We extracted 28 linguistic features, encompassing phonological, lexico-semantic, morpho-syntactic, and discourse/pragmatic domains. We utilized a semi-automated approach with Computerized Language ANalysis (CLAN) to compare the frequency of production of various linguistic features across the three language groups. Our findings revealed distinct proportional differences in linguistic feature usage among English, Chinese, and Italian speakers. Specifically, we found a reduced production of prepositions, conjunctions, and pronouns, and increased adverb use in the Chinese-speakers compared to the other two languages. Furthermore, English participants produced a higher proportion of prepositions, while Italian speakers produced significantly more conjunctions and empty pauses than the other groups. These findings demonstrate that the frequency of specific linguistic phenomena varies across languages, even when using the same harmonized task. This underscores the critical need to develop linguistically tailored language assessment tools and to identify speech markers that are appropriate for aphasia patients across different languages.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 30%
15.7%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 15%
10.4%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
6.5%
4
Cortex
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.6%
5
Brain Communications
based on 79 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
6
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
based on 31 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 0.8%
2.9%
8
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Human Brain Mapping
based on 53 papers
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
2.5%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
based on 31 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 8%
1.6%
15
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
16
NeuroImage
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
17
Neurology
based on 38 papers
Top 5%
1.4%
18
Journal of Neural Engineering
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Neurobiology of Aging
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Brain Sciences
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 7%
1.2%
22
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Clinical Neurophysiology
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
26
Scientific Data
based on 30 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
based on 28 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
28
European Journal of Neurology
based on 20 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Alzheimer's & Dementia
based on 84 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Cerebral Cortex
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.7%