Back

Treadmill step training promotes corticospinal tract plasticity after incomplete spinal cord injury

Eisdorfer, J. T.; Nacht, H. D.; Kowalski, T.; Thackray, J. T.; Martinez, A. M.; Zymoro, L.; Phu, M. V.; Hirpara, R. R.; Danish, B. S.; Wang, R.; Khondker, A.; Eisdorfer, A. B.; Tischfield, M.; Abraira, V. E. G.

2024-10-16 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.14.618099 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often impairs motor functions such as voluntary movement and fine motor control, with the corticospinal tract (CST) being a crucial pathway affected. While CST-targeted rehabilitation, such as treadmill training, supports motor recovery, gaps remain in understanding the topographical changes within the CST and how they correlate with behavioral outcomes. In this study, we utilized a custom Emx1Cre;LSL-SynGFP mouse line to quantify CST plasticity following moderate contusion SCI, both with and without exercise (treadmill) training. Fluorescent labeling of cortical synapses allowed for detailed visualization of descending CST rewiring, and we assessed its relationship to behavioral outcomes, including kinematics analysis and motivational state. Mice were stratified by motivational state using the Progressive Ratio Assay, and locomotor recovery was evaluated through the Basso Mouse Scale (BMS), joint/limb kinematics, and Motion Sequencing (MoSeq) analysis. Our findings indicate that treadmill training enhances CST rewiring, especially in highly motivated animals, leading to increased synaptic density in the ventral horn and improved BMS subscores. Motivation further influenced specific kinematic parameters, such as toe clearance, while treadmill training significantly improved speed by reducing the stance phase. Results suggest that while treadmill training induces broad beneficial outcomes, motivation may fine-tune recovery, influencing neural circuit and behavioral changes. This suggests multiple mechanisms converge to promote recovery--those we cannot control and those we can. These results underscore the combined role of task-specific training and also perhaps motivation in driving CST plasticity and functional recovery after SCI.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
7
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
9
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
13
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
14
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
21
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%