Who is asking ChatGPT health questions? Analysis of a nationally representative Australian community sample
Ayre, J.; Cvejic, E.; McCaffery, K. J.
Show abstract
ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools have dramatically changed the health information environment. Discussions about their benefits and risks need clear evidence about who is using them and why. This nationally representative survey estimates that one in ten Australians asked ChatGPT a health question in the past 6 months (95%CI: 8.5%{square}11.4%), with higher use in key priority groups: people born in a non-English speaking country, who speak a non-English language at home, and who have low health literacy. As usage increases, we need to equip community with knowledge and skills to use these tools safely.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 92%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 92%
- Socioeconomic and demographic patterning of family uptake of a paediatric electronic patient portal innovation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 93%
- Co-production of an online research and resource platform for improving the health of young people - The HYPE Project 92%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological, social and financial impact of COVID-19 on culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a cross-sectional Australian study 94%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 92%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 92%
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 92%
- Collecting mortality data via mobile phone surveys: a non-inferiority randomized trial in Malawi 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.