Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Gynecological Cancers: A Population-based Cohort Study
Ye, Y.; Junping, y.; Bin-shu, L.; Li-wei, C.; Shu-Jian, W.; Yu-Guo, C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe survival rate of gynecological cancers (GCs) has improved significantly in recent decades. Patients with GCs did not necessarily succumb to the primary cancer. Cardiovascular health might be a critical determinant of long-term survival. This study aimed to investigate the mortality rate and risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) death in patients with GCs. MethodsA total of 399,399 cases of GCs diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in this study. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for CVD mortality was estimated. Prognostic factors for CVD death were assessed using cause-specific hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals within a competing risk model, considering non-cardiovascular death as a competing risk. ResultsOf the 399,399 patients with GCs, 117,551 (29%) died from GCs, and 16,371 (4.1%) died from CVD. Of the CVD deaths, 73.2% were attributed to heart disease. The SMR of CVD mortality was highest in survivors diagnosed before age 45 years, and the risk of CVD mortality remained elevated throughout the follow-up period compared to the general United States (US) population. In recent years, the SMRs for CVD mortality risk increased steadily in all subtypes of GCs, except for vulvar cancer. Older age, black race, localized stage, unmarried/single/divorced, vaginal and vulvar cancers, and radiation therapy were associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality. A nomogram was developed and validated using these variables to predict CVD death risk in patients with GCs. ConclusionsThe risk of CVD mortality in patients with GCs was increased and was significantly higher compared with the general US population. A nomogram was constructed and validated to forecast the risk of CVD mortality in individuals with GCs. More attention should be paid to cardiovascular health during diagnosis to improve survival rates. HIGHLIGHTS{Rightarrow} 29% of patients with gynecological cancers died from cancer, while 4.1% died from CVD, with 73.2% of CVD deaths attributed to heart disease. {Rightarrow}In recent years, SMRs for CVD mortality increased steadily across all GC subtypes, except vulvar cancer. {Rightarrow}Higher CVD mortality was linked to older age, black race, localized disease stage, unmarried/single/divorced status, and prior radiation therapy, especially in vaginal and vulvar cancers. {Rightarrow}We developed and validated a nomogram to predict CVD death risk in GC patients, aiding personalized patient management.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating serum miRNAs predict response to platinum chemotherapy in high-grade serous ovarian cancer 93%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 93%
- Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors on new-onset overall cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- NDRG1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer 93%
- Trends in pregnancy-associated cervical cancer in Japan between 2012 and 2017: A multicenter survey 93%
- COL7A1 expression improves prognosis prediction for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma atop of stage 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 95%
- Periostin facilitates ovarian cancer recurrence by enhancing cancer stemness 93%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 93%
- Age-related differences in cancer relative survival in the US: a SEER-18 analysis 92%
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the global data involving 61,532 cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
- Missing data in the medical record for oncology patients: prevalence and association with outcomes 93%
- Venous Thromboembolism and the Effects of Statin and Hormone Therapy: A Case-Control Study of 250,000 Women 50-64 years of age 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.