Back

Long-term clinical and patient reported outcomes of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens

Latz, C.; Licht, A.; Ponto, K. A.; Menzel-Severing, J.; Pinero, D. P.; Mirshahi, A.

2024-10-15 ophthalmology
10.1101/2024.10.12.24315376 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo evaluate long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) following the implantation of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). MethodsThis ambispective non-comparative single-centre study involved 41 patients (ages 48-84) who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with the Tecnis Eyhance IOL (model ICB00, Johnson & Johnson Vision). Distance and intermediate visual acuities, refraction, and PROMs were assessed 18 months or more after surgery. Spectacle independence was evaluated using the PRSIQ questionnaire, with patients self-reporting on visual quality, difficulties in performing specific tasks and perception of photic phenomena at distance and intermediate vision. ResultsAt 18 months or later, 100.0%, 73.2%, 100% and 79.5% of patients achieved a binocular uncorrected distance, uncorrected intermediate, corrected distance, and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity of 0.20 logMAR or better, respectively. Less than 10% of patients reported photic phenomena. Mean visual quality scores were 1.68{+/-}0.72 for distance and 2.05{+/-}0.92 for intermediate vision (1=very good to 6=very poor). The dashboard was clearly visible while driving for 95.1% of patients, while 45.0% could perform screen work without glasses; an additional 40.0% could do so with enlarged fonts. Complete spectacle independence was reported by 87.8% for distance vision, and 53.7% for intermediate vision. At least moderately satisfied were 90.2% with distance vision, 87.8% with intermediate vision, and 51.2% with near vision. ConclusionsThe enhanced monofocal IOL ICB00 provides good long-term distance and intermediate visual quality, leading to considerable spectacle independence and patient satisfaction. Most patients required near vision correction.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.