Comparative assessment of machine learning algorithms to predict severity of disease in COVID-19 patients based on eight cofactors
Patel, T. S.; Patel, D. P.; El-Sayed, H.; Sanyal, M.; Shrivastav, P. S.
Show abstract
Machine learning is one of the important tools to diagnose and predict the diseased state accurately and effectively. The COVID-19 pandemic caused due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become one of the most researched healthcare topics worldwide. Machine learning algorithms can find efficient and reliable ways to predict the COVID-19 from vast amounts of existing health care data, allowing faster, effective, and more accurate diagnosis with lower risk based on the symptoms. Based on the countrywide data published by the Israeli Ministry of Health, we propose a system that detects COVID-19 instances using simple variables. The COVID-19 dataset used in the study consisted of 278848 patients samples with five different symptoms, namely cough, fever, sore throat, shortness of breath, and headache, apart from other basic information like age, gender, and test indication excluding confirmed COVID-19 result. The data was analyzed using traditional supervised machine learning algorithms namely, Decision tree, Support vector machine, Random Forest, Logistic regression, k-nearest neighbor, and Naive Bayes based on eight cofactors with high accuracy rate ([≥] 0.9450). Apart from Support vector machine, all other algorithms displayed better performance based on the AUC score calculated using the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. This study also highlights the significant differences between precision, recall and accuracy for each model. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=97 SRC="FIGDIR/small/617884v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (19K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@33bb11org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3e93aaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@508f76org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@faa9e2_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical AbstractC_FLOATNO C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving prediction of drug-target interactions based on fusing multiple features with data balancing and feature selection techniques 96%
- ChatGPT-Enhanced ROC Analysis (CERA): A Shiny Web Tool for Finding Optimal Cutoff in Biomarker Analysis 96%
- Artificial intelligence tool for the study of COVID-19 microdroplet spread across the human diameter and airborne space 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 97%
- MACI: A machine learning-based approach to identify drug classes of antibiotic resistance genes from metagenomic data 95%
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the Epidemic Curve of the Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Disease (COVID-19) Using Artificial Intelligence 96%
- Extensive In Silico Analysis of the Functional and Structural Consequences of SNPs in Human ARX Gene 94%
- Epitope-Based Peptide Vaccine against Bombali Ebolavirus Viral Protein 40: An Immunoinformatics Combined with Molecular Docking Studies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 96%
- Comparing protein-protein interaction networks of SARS-CoV-2 and (H1N1) influenza using topological features 95%
- Machine learning prediction of antiviral-HPV protein interactions for anti-HPV pharmacotherapy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 95%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 93%
- Identification of prognostic biomarkers for suppressing tumorigenesis and metastasis of Hepatocellular carcinoma through transcriptome analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.