Chikungunya Virus VLP Vaccine: Phase 3 Trial in Adolescents and Adults
Richardson, J. S.; Anderson, D. M.; Mendy, J.; Tindale, L. C.; Muhammad, S.; Loreth, T.; Royalty Tredo, S.; Warfield, K. L.; Ramanathan, R.; Caso, J.; Jenkins, V. A.; Ajiboye, P.; Bedell, L.
Show abstract
1BackgroundChikungunya disease is a growing global public health concern. Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine is a single dose, pre-filled syringe for intramuscular injection. MethodsA pivotal phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in healthy adolescents and adults 12-64 years of age. Participants received either CHIKV VLP vaccine or placebo on Day 1. Immunogenicity objectives assessed CHIKV serum neutralizing antibody (SNA) titers (NT80) at selected timepoints. Safety was assessed through Day 183 postvaccination. ResultsA total of 2790 participants received CHIKV VLP vaccine and 464 received placebo (n=3454). Coprimary endpoints were met including 1) immunologic superiority to placebo and 2) geometric mean titer at Day 22. Results demonstrated that CHIKV VLP vaccine induced a protective seroresponse (SNA NT80 [≥]100; considered the presumptive seroprotective antibody response), in 97% of individuals at Day 15 (2 weeks), in 98% of individuals at Day 22, and in 86% of individuals at Day 183 (6 months). CHIKV VLP vaccine demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The majority of adverse events were self-limited and grade 1 or 2 in severity. The most common adverse events were injection site pain, fatigue, headache, and myalgia. ConclusionsCHIKV VLP vaccine induces a rapid and robust immune response by Day 15 that lasts through Day 183 postvaccination. These findings support the potential for this vaccine to protect individuals 12-64 years of age from disease caused by CHIKV. (Funded by Emergent BioSolutions Inc. and Bavarian Nordic A/S [as successor in interest to Emergent BioSolutions Inc.]; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05072080).
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and Safety Following a Homologous Booster Dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 97%
- A Phase 1: Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-BBV152 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of An Egg-Based Inactivated Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Interim Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Trial in Vietnam 97%
- Safety of the NVX-CoV2373 COVID-19 Vaccine in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials 97%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: A Randomised, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 DNA Vaccine INO-4800 Induces Durable Immune Responses Capable of Being Boosted in a Phase 1 Open-Label Trial 96%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster administered by intradermal or intramuscular route in Thai Older adults 94%
- Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and hybrid immunity in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 among adults in the United States 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity of JN.1- and KP.2-Encoding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Against 1 JN.1 Subvariants in Adult Participants 96%
- Homologous and heterologous boosting of the ChAdOx1-S1-S COVID-19 vaccine with the SCB-2019 vaccine candidate: a randomized, observer-blinded, controlled, phase 2 study 95%
- Global Safety Assessment of Adverse Events of Special Interest Following 2 Years of Use and 772 Million Administered Doses of mRNA-1273 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.