Back

De novo rates of a Trypanosoma-resistant mutation in two human populations

Melamed, D.; Shemer, R.; Bolotin, E.; Yakass, M. B.; Fink-Barkai, D.; Hiadzi, E. K.; Skorecki, K. L.; Livnat, A.

2024-10-10 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.10.10.617206 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Until recently, mutation rates have only been measured as averages across many genomic positions. Recently, a method to measure mutation rates at the single-mutation resolution was applied to a narrow region in the human hemoglobin subunit beta (HBB) gene containing the site of the hemoglobin S (HbS) mutation as well as to a paralogous hemoglobin subunit delta (HBD) region, in sperm samples from sub-Saharan African and northern European donors. The HbS mutation, which protects against malaria while causing sickle-cell anemia in homozygotes originated de novo significantly more frequently in the HBB gene in Africans compared to the other three test cases combined (the European HBB gene and the European and African HBD gene). Here, we apply this approach to the human apolipopro-tein L1 (APOL1) gene containing the site of the G1 1024A[->]G mutation, which protects against African sleeping sickness caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense while causing a substantially increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in homozygotes. We find that the 1024A[->]G mutation is the mutation of highest de novo origination rate and deviates most from the genome-wide average rate for its type (A[->]G) compared to all other observable mutations in the region, and that it originates de novo significantly more frequently in Africans than in Europeans--i.e., in the population where it is of adaptive significance. The results are inconsistent with the notion that the probability of a specific mutational event is independent of its value to the organism and underscore the importance of studying mutation rates at the single-mutation resolution.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.