Chikungunya Virus VLP Vaccine: Phase 3 Trial in Adults >= 65 Years of Age
Tindale, L. C.; Richardson, J. S.; Anderson, D. M.; Mendy, J.; Muhammad, S.; Loreth, T.; Royalty Tredo, S.; Ramanathan, R.; Jenkins, V. A.; Bedell, L.; Ajiboye, P.
Show abstract
1BackgroundAdults [≥]65 years of age are at increased risk for atypical presentations of chikungunya disease as well as severe outcomes including death. MethodsA phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted in adults [≥]65 years of age where participants received a single intramuscular dose of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine or placebo on Day 1. Baseline and postvaccination CHIKV serum neutralizing antibody (SNA) titers (NT80) were assessed at selected timepoints. Safety was assessed through Day 183. ResultsA total of 413 participants (206 vaccine, 207 placebo) were randomized. Coprimary endpoints were met including 1) immunologic superiority of CHIKV SNA titers compared to placebo and 2) by geometric mean titer at Day 22. CHIKV VLP vaccine induced a protective seroresponse (SNA NT80 [≥]100; considered the presumptive seroprotective antibody response), in 82% of individuals at Day 15, in 87% of individuals at Day 22, and in 76% of individuals at Day 183. There were no notable differences in AE rates between groups and most AEs were grade 1 or 2 in severity. No vaccine-related serious adverse events or deaths occurred. ConclusionsWe provide robust data from adults [≥]65 years of age demonstrating that CHIKV VLP vaccine has a favorable safety profile and can provide a high rate of protection within 2 weeks postvaccination and through 6 months of follow-up. (Funded by Emergent BioSolutions Inc. and Bavarian Nordic A/S [as successor in interest to Emergent BioSolutions Inc.]; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05349617).
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 97%
- Immunogenicity and Safety Following a Homologous Booster Dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 97%
- A Phase 1: Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-BBV152 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety of the NVX-CoV2373 COVID-19 Vaccine in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials 97%
- Immunogenicity and Safety of Booster Dose of S-268019-b or Tozinameran in Japanese Participants: An Interim Report of Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study 96%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: A Randomised, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity of JN.1- and KP.2-Encoding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Against 1 JN.1 Subvariants in Adult Participants 95%
- Homologous and heterologous boosting of the ChAdOx1-S1-S COVID-19 vaccine with the SCB-2019 vaccine candidate: a randomized, observer-blinded, controlled, phase 2 study 95%
- Global Safety Assessment of Adverse Events of Special Interest Following 2 Years of Use and 772 Million Administered Doses of mRNA-1273 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune Memory Response After a Booster Injection of mRNA-1273 for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) 96%
- Phase 1 trial of a Candidate Recombinant Virus-Like Particle Vaccine for Covid-19 Disease Produced in Plants 95%
- BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant in Qatar 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.