Back

Back to the Future: Environmental genomic selection to take advantage of polygenic local adaptation

Halpin-McCormick, A.; Campbell, Q.; Negrao, S.; Morrell, P. L.; Hubner, S.; Neyhart, J.; Kantar, M. B.

2024-10-14 plant biology
10.1101/2024.10.09.617488 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The genetic basis of adaptation is a fundamental question in evolutionary genetics. Environmental association analysis (EAA) and various allele frequency comparisons in genomic environmental association (GEA) have become standard approaches for investigating the genetic basis of adaptation to natural environments. While these analyses provide insight into local adaptation, they have not been widely adopted in breeding or conservation programs. This may be attributable to the difficulty in identifying the best individuals for transplantation/relocation in conservation efforts or identification of the best parents in breeding programs. To explore the use of EAA and GEA for future breeding programs, we used a cereal crop - barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as our case-study species due to its wide adaptability to different environments and agro-ecologies, ranging from marginal and low input fields to high-productive farms. Here, we use publicly available data to conduct environmental genomic selection (EGS) on 753 landrace barley accessions using a mini-core of 31 landrace accessions and a de-novo core of 100 as the training populations. Environmental genomic selection is to environmental association analysis (EAA) what genomic selection is to genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Since local adaptation to the environment is polygenic, a whole-genome approach is likely to be more accurate for selecting for environmental adaptation. Here we show distinct genetic background and population differences and how an integrative approach coupling environmental genomic selection and species distribution modelling can help identify key parents for breeding for adaptation to specific environmental variables and geographies to minimize linkage drag.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.8%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
7
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
8
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
11
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
21
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%