Back

Associations of PFASs and Pesticides with Lung Function Changes from Adolescence to Young Adulthood in the ESPINA study

Kornher, K.; Gould, C. F.; Meeko Manzano, J.; Baines, K.; Kayser, G.; Tu, X.; Suarez-Torres, J.; Martinez, D.; Suarez-Lopez, J. R.

2024-10-10 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.10.09.24315189 medRxiv
Show abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and pesticides are ubiquitous environmental exposures with increasingly recognized adverse health outcomes; however, their impact on lung function, particularly in combination, remains poorly understood. We included 381 adolescent participants from a prospective cohort study in Ecuador who underwent measurements of serum PFAS (perfluorooctanoic acid [PFOA], perfluorooctanesulfonic acid [PFOS] and perfluorononanoic acid [PFNA]) and urinary herbicides (glyphosate, 2,4D) and fungicides (ethylene thiourea) and had spirometric measurements in either 2016 or 2022. We characterized the association between each PFAS or pesticide and each lung function measure in log-log models estimated via ordinary least squares regression. We used quantile g-computation to assess the association of the mixture of PFAS and pesticides with lung function outcomes. After accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, and in models adjusting for household income, parental education, and exposure to tobacco, we found that, individually, PFOA, glyphosate, and ETU were associated with slight increases in FEV1/FVC between 2016 and 2022. No other individual associations were significant. In mixtures analyses, a one quartile increase in all PFASs and pesticides simultaneously was also not associated with statistically significant changes in lung function outcomes after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing. In large part, we do not provide evidence for associations of PFAS and herbicide and fungicide pesticides with lung function among adolescents in moderate-to-high-altitude agricultural communities in Ecuador.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
6
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
9
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
11
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.2%
13
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%